Whose Planet Is It Anyway?: Poof! The Vaccine Lawsuit

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Poof! The Vaccine Lawsuit

My graveyard now has a new resident—the vaccine lawsuit, along with the profiteering quacks who spawned it:

For the occasion, I've composed a new version of "Puff, the Magic Dragon" by Peter, Paul & Mary. Enjoy.

[Chorus:]
Poof! The vaccine lawsuit
Lacked all sanity
Deluded schemers dreamed of loot
In the land of fantasy.

Without a shred of science
The rascals spewed out guff
Tied up with strings and sealing wax
And other fancy stuff.

[Chorus]

Together they would travel
In search of easy marks
To conferences and parent groups
Just like so many sharks.

Autism societies
Would bow to their brash claims
Publishers would print their trash
When the editors saw their names.

[Chorus]

Some urban legends live forever
But not so greedy quacks
Whose marketing plan was nothing but
Junk science and nasty attacks.

One fine day it happened
The court knew that they lied
And Poof! The vaccine lawsuit
Shriveled up and died.

With no more easy targets
To cheat and abuse
The quacks no longer could invent
False epidemic news.

Now known for what they were
Their lies could not shock
So all those slimy quacks just
Crawled back under their rock.

[Chorus]

Labels: biomed, graveyard

214 Comments:

"So all those slimy quacks just
Crawled back under their rock."

If ONLY! I don't know what they'll do, but it won't be pretty.

They just got the news on the EoH Board - I'm looking forward to reading their comments. Conspiracy theorists can be funny!

Nice song, I like it.

By Clay, at 2:22 PM
Report back, Clay! I can't wait for Best's rejoinder on his blog;

"Oh Big Pharma bought out the Vaccine Court! It's a conspiracy! The Vaccine Court poisons babies. Do something about it!"

What did Matt Hogan say on the other thread about "diapers" (or nappys as we call them here in Australia)? LMAO!

By Anonymous, at 5:25 PM
I propose a cyber toast to this case being lost and reason and sanity prevailing. I'm going to fill my wine beverage with a non-alcoholic beverage since I do not drink alcohol.

By Anonymous, at 7:25 PM
Brilliant! I'd rate this as "vintage abfh" for sure! :-)

By Niksmom, at 7:54 PM
Mint, abfh! Totally mint!

:D

JBJr's not gonna be a happy bunny but fuck him and his idiot friends! :P

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:05 AM
Gloating about the fact that corrupt judges have ruled in favor of poisoning babies is about what I expect from mental midgets. I'm more concerned that they are trying to mess with the 2nd amendment.

By John Best, at 7:56 AM
Well, that's not a bad reply from our resident idiot. Of course he hasn't read any of the judgements, but they are probably beyond him. I wonder how he knows what the second is when he's er so challenged?

By Alyric, at 10:18 AM
alyric: "Well, that's not a bad reply from our resident idiot. Of course he hasn't read any of the judgements, but they are probably beyond him. I wonder how he knows what the second is when he's - er - so challenged?"

Seems that the judgements are not all that's beyond his understanding... another thread on this blog demonstrates his incapacity to understand quid pro quo interaction. He probably doesn't know what's on the Second Amendment ... I think he wants to start a Dad's Army in New Hampshire. He probably knows that NH has a right to rebellion, but doesn't know the conditions under which it's okay to do that!

"New Hampshire's constitution guarantees its citizens the right to rebellion, in Article 10 of the constitution's Bill of Rights:

Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government."

All three of those conditions must be fulfilled. Otherwise, the rebellion is without just cause and counts as an insurrection.

He can't even prove that his son's autism was caused by mercury: how the fuck is he going to demonstrate justification for particiation in what is likely to be a minor insurrection in Southern New Hampshire?!

The man's just intent on making a twat of himself, no?

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 10:44 AM
Alyric and Fat Bastard,
I doubt either one of you understands that domestic enemies are now running the United States. It is the duty of all American citizens to throw them out of office.

I understand that most of the brain dead public doesn't know what's going on yet. Those of us who still know how to think are going to change that. Our numbers grow daily.

By John Best, at 11:07 AM
"I doubt either one of you understands that domestic enemies are now running the United States. It is the duty of all American citizens to throw them out of office."

LoL

A mixed race guy gets into power and JBJr's trying to get him out!!!!

OMFG!

He is a racist bastard! LoL

How pathetic!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 11:18 AM
Timelord said...

Report back, Clay!

Well, here's a good example of some deep denial from EoH:

"I like to look at things like this as a good thing, in that we can appeal to a higher court. The higher the court, the less likely they will have conflict of interests; and also, the higher the court, the more clout the ruling would have. Thus, I like to think of this ruling as a stepping stone. What we need to do next is find out about appealing this ruling. I'll bet you anything, that the families will be approached to settle out of court to keep them from appealing, a gag order included. Thus, what we need to be looking at is: what would be the appeal step that follows, are the families intending on such, and do we need to come together to donate them some money to make this happen. A ten dollar spot from thousands of people could go a long way."

It's hard to believe this person is serious, but she is.

By Clay, at 11:58 AM
Cube Demon: Cheers!

Clay, Niksmom, and David: Thanks much -- glad you enjoyed it!

Foresam: I'm sure you must have a very large Homeland Security file by now...

By abfh, at 12:17 PM
Thanks for the quote, Clay! Oh boy, are they clutching at straws now?!

"I like to look at things like this as a good thing, in that we can appeal to a higher court. The higher the court, the less likely they will have conflict of interests; and also, the higher the court, the more clout the ruling would have."

First bit most likely true: they can indeed appeal to a higher court. Second bit naïve, though: there's nothing to guarantee that the next higher court will have less 'conflict of interest' than the lower one that did not find in their favour. The higher court may well effectively say, "What the lower court said AND ... " (where ... may include further findings that arise from the examination of the newer evidence (since appeals cannot be made purely on ground that the lower court "didn't give (us) what (we) wanted"!) ... pity they haven't thought of that issue: they'll really need to bring something new.

"Thus, I like to think of this ruling as a stepping stone. What we need to do next is find out about appealing this ruling."

That bit is actually sensible: anybody not checking out this part of the process could be doing themselves out of something in their interests. Equally, an appeal could go the other way ... in a number of criminal court appeals, for example, the defendant has appealed a sentence and wound up with a heavier sentence on appeal.

"I'll bet you anything, that the families will be approached to settle out of court to keep them from appealing, a gag order included."

That is pure speculation. I won't say paranoia: gag orders have been used in the past, no doubt. I doubt that this case has had one, but we still cannot say for sure.

"Thus, what we need to be looking at is: what would be the appeal step that follows, are the families intending on such, and do we need to come together to donate them some money to make this happen. A ten dollar spot from thousands of people could go a long way."

Can't knock for that, actually. I'd say that a reversal of this verdict on appeal is very unlikely, but it's their money, should the original familes try to appeal the special Vaccine Court's decision.

Thing is: if they did go through with an appeal and the appellate court did not reverse that decision, how far would people go before:

a- they decided to accept the inevitable (that vaccines did not and do not cause autism); and/or,

b- they ran out of money?

Because the money that they are prepared to risk wasting on appeals against this decision could be put to better uses, like establishing funds for children who are autistic to get services and supports (on, say, the basis of a cooperative organisation - formed by them - putting 2-5% of the initial funding down and asking the state governments and the federal one to contribute at least the other 95-98% to the coffers). This I'm putting here as an idea, gratis, for any EoH-people to take up as a probably more effective way to use monies raised.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 12:19 PM
My prediction;

"Oh Big Pharma bought out the Vaccine Court! It's a conspiracy! The Vaccine Court poisons babies. Do something about it!"

Best's actual response;

"Gloating about the fact that corrupt judges have ruled in favor of poisoning babies is about what I expect from mental midgets."

Reading between the lines - the two are the same aren't they?

I understand that most of the brain dead public doesn't know what's going on yet. Those of us who still know how to think are going to change that. Our numbers grow daily.

As do the padded cells waiting for you. Stop implanting your crazy ideas on us, Best. You're more off with the pixies than anyone I've ever met online.

I doubt either one of you understands that domestic enemies are now running the United States.

Al Queda? (LOL) Another example of paranoia! If anyone is a "domestic enemy" it's you. A failure who is looking for a scapegoat to cover his tracks. Of course those NH politicians voted that piece of legislation down. They knew rubbish when they saw it.

It is the duty of all American citizens to throw them out of office.

It is the duty of the world to laugh at you, attack you and expose you for what you are.

Idiot.

By Anonymous, at 5:49 PM
David - The thing is a higher court would require a much higher standard of scientific evidence. I've only looked briefly at the Cedillo decision at this point, but I got the impression (and this has been mentioned elsewhere) that the standard of the petitioners was poor. That means that such evidence would be inadmissable in a higher court.

So an appeal would be doomed to fail.

Thanks for that, Clay!

And just that Al Queda post on his blog alone would have beefed up Best's Homeland Security file nicely, ABFH!

One more thing - can someone else tell this Aussie what the second amendment is? I only know the first and the fifth. I'm not "er so challenged" (TY Alyric!) like Best is!

By Anonymous, at 5:50 PM
Timelord

Here is a link to answer your question. http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am2

By Anonymous, at 6:08 PM
Timenut,
The 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms. That means I can blow your head off if you ever step on my property and it's legal.

By John Best, at 6:48 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:24 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:25 PM
Phil: "Reading between the lines - the two are the same aren't they?"

Pretty much, yeh! :)

Phil, again: "So an appeal would be doomed to fail."

Pretty much my thoughts, to be honest.

ForeSkin: "That means I can blow your head off if you ever step on my property and it's legal."

Again the Amazing Prepuce shows his lack of knowledge! No, it doesn't mean that anyone walking onto your property is liable to have their head blown off (at least not without it being murder on your part). And about 18mths ago, the NH State Supreme Court actually placed that right under regulation! Whatever the extent of that regulation, your intent to blow the head off anyone who stepped onto you property (regardless of intention) would demonstrate that you we not acting in defence of that property... you would have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the person walking onto your property had the intent to destroy your property or you and/or your family. Arms can only be used in self-defence, and that - under law - means that it is your burden of proof to demonstrate that you were under threat so severe as to justify a homicide. Just walking onto someone's property is proof of no such intent. For an alleged Master's graduate, Prepuce, you're not very clever, are you?

(edited to include this)

Now, I'm not a lawyer (although I have some knowledge of law as it pertains to legal and forensic psychology), but I know that there are lawyers who read this. Maybe one or two of those could clarify for Mr. Prepuce how the law stands on him blowing people's heads off for merely walking onto his property.

(and this)

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner."

(http://www.constitution.org/mil/rkba1982.htm)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:29 PM
Worth bearing in mind, also, is that - should the Amazing prepuce actually carry out such an unwarranted shooting and kill someone (purely for walking onto his property!), a guilty verdict in a court of law (which would - without evidence of self-defence - be very inevitable) would almost certainly lead to a penalty of death being imposed on said Amazing Prepuce.

And having stated on this blog that he would actually act in such a manner, it could be proven that he was - in all probability - not acting in self-defence. I think that the Amazing Prepuce has just practically signed his own death warrant should he go ahead and commit to such an act.

In his shoes, I'd be a little more circumspect about what I put on a blog. ABFH herself may see the initial post as possibly construable as a threat to kill, and therefore wipe it; but I'd ask her to leave in the references to that post as reminders that Mr. Best was warned that his conduct is being noted, and that he is now treading on not-so-safe ground.

My message to John is simple: be very careful what you say! If you haven't already learned from the NH DDC job withdrawal, then for pity's sake, John (and, more importantly, for Sam's!), PLEASE don't go saying stupid stuff that could easily get you into serious trouble. None of us here would actually want that to happen (not even Timelord, and he may well have more reason than most to actually want that!). You'd be absolutely no help at all to Sam if you were in prison. Don't even tempt that fate, for his sake if nobody else's.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:41 PM
Mr. Andrews

This is why I will not give Best my address. I have to protect my family.

Mr Andrews, he might have committed the crime of Affray against timelord. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affray

He's already commited the crime of Affray againt me by threatening me with aggravated assault.

By Anonymous, at 9:34 PM
Fat Bastard,
I'm very concerned that my words to nitwits are being noted by other nitwits. Reminds me of the extremely obese lesbian who tried to have my blog deleted because someone suggested she should be killed. And you wonder why I call all of you nitwits.

By John Best, at 10:50 PM
And here's the moderator of EoH, Lenny Schafer himself, introducing a letter from Dr. Geier.

"Here is a comment from Dr. Mark Geier on the vaccine court rulings:"

Vaccine Court Ruling

First I also do not think MMR is a significant cause of autism.
Second the the ruling is not from a court. It is from the Vaccine
Compensation Act. The special masters work for HHS which is not even in the judicial branch. Remember HHS runs both FDA and CDC. It is impossible to get a non-bias ruling about causation from those who give the vaccines. It is sort of like asking the fox in the hen house if anyone has stolen any chickens. Also I can assure you the ruling will be appealed first to the US Court of Claims which is also not a real court as it is also in the executive not judicial branch. From there it will be appealed to the US Circuit Court which is a real court. This court has almost always reversed such rulings but we will have to see what they rule. Also we still await ruling on the Thimerosal (mercury) cases. Remember that HHS has already conceded the first case that claimed Thimerosal as a cause.

- Mark Geier

By Clay, at 1:13 AM
And this was written *in response* to Geier's letter, by the same whack job I first quoted.

"HOORAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE GOT EM!!!!!!!!! We can't lose!? We just have to wait for them to decide on whether or not they choose to concede in their own pseudo-court, or if they want?it?to go to?appeal?at possibly eventually the Supreme Court.? I have seen several Surpreme Court rulings, and they sure look like a bunch of individuals who are NOT bought and paid for. Thus, they will give an honest ruling.? I can't wait!!! The sooner the better!!!!!!!?"

Where's the reality in that? The VICP court said the decision "wasn't even close".

By Clay, at 1:34 AM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 3:40 AM
The Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "I'm very concerned that my words to nitwits are being noted by other nitwits. Reminds me of the extremely obese lesbian who tried to have my blog deleted because someone suggested she should be killed. And you wonder why I call all of you nitwits."

No wonder people hate you, John: you just don't give a shit. It seems that we are right about your mixed disorder of personality. You are one fucked up individual.

Whatever happens to you because of what you say, you will have brought it on yourself, you stupid idiot. Don't say we didn't try to reason with you. I suppose 'once an imbecile, always an imbecile' is true in our case.

And you don't give a shit about your son, it would seem (based on the fact that your behaviour hasn't changed at all, despite the fact that... ) ... ah, what's the point? Trying to get an idiot like you to see sence is like trying to get blood from a stone.

Cube Demon: "He's already commited the crime of Affray against me by threatening me with aggravated assault."

That is true. Seems we are in fact dealing with a criminal psychopath. Shitting Jesus... what poor Sam must be going through every day with a father like that, I don't know. Can't be nice.

Clay (quoting a tosspot): "First I also do not think MMR is a significant cause of autism."

Climb-down, anyone?

As for JBJr, maybe he should be reported to the police for his behaviour: maybe prison or a secure hospital is the best place for him to be (at least, as far as other people's safety - including that of his son - is concerned). No point trying to get him to behave reasonably - it seems to be outwith his comprehension and will.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:17 AM
That means I can blow your head off if you ever step on my property and it's legal.

There you have it, readers. Best just admitted by proxy that he is shit scared of me. Leaping to firearms to defend a point of view is an act of cowardice.

I'm very concerned that my words to nitwits are being noted by other nitwits.

When one considers the sort of people Best considers "nitwits" he should be concerned! He should be pissing in his pants! The report you refer to was justified, and boy are you lucky Google are such idiots and won't uphold their own terms of service without a court order.

David, Best doesn't give a stuff anymore. He has already gone on record that Sam is on a one way trip to an institution if he can't be cured. He'll look on jail time as martyr time such is his delusional thought patterns. It has got to the point that actually - David - you're wrong. I do want him to get into serious trouble. It seems that it is the only way he'll be properly dealt with. Unfortunately.

Clay, you're right. Geier is a fool. Under the Constitution it IS a court! It makes enforceable decisions in the judicial system! Therefore it's a court of law!! Yeah sure, it's jurisdiction may be that one act but that's beside the point! Even the Supreme Court only handles certain cases under certain Acts!! Not only that, as I have said before - the higher courts will demand a much higher standard of science. That will discount virtually all of the respondent's scientific junk as admissable evidence if Chief Master Hastings is anyone to go by.

Also - the Poling case (which I assume is the case Geier was talking about) was conceeded because of vaccine damage under the Act. That is - in practicality - the regression. There was NO admission of the specifics of the causation.

And if the respondents are brought to the Circuit Court, the decision of Judge Berger at the start of 2008 would become a factor. Precedents count in the legal system!

By Anonymous, at 5:24 AM
Phil: "David, Best doesn't give a stuff anymore. He has already gone on record that Sam is on a one way trip to an institution if he can't be cured. He'll look on jail time as martyr time such is his delusional thought patterns. It has got to the point that actually - David - you're wrong. I do want him to get into serious trouble. It seems that it is the only way he'll be properly dealt with. Unfortunately."

Actually, particularly after the Amazingly Stupid Prepuce's tirade at me, I'm more than happy to be wrong on what you'd like for him. And I think you're absolutely correct about the best way to deal with someone like him.

And, on the matter of Sam, again you are sadly corect on that issue, too. He has indeed said that, on record; and I can't believe that he gives a shit about his own son, if that is what he still thinks should happen to Sam.

Poor Sam. That's all I can say. Basically... this is how much John Best loves his son: "Get normal, or get to hell!"

Nice man, no?

Phil, again: "There you have it, readers. Best just admitted by proxy that he is shit scared of me."

Nope. He admitted it pretty directly, because - in law - he'd HAVE to show that you presented such a threat to him that you had to be shot upon entering his property. If you didn't scare him, he'd have no legitimate reason to blow your head off. So if he says he's not scared of you then he's just threatened murder. Interesting to see how that one would pan out in a law court, no?

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:00 AM
Andrews,
How often does your daffy ex-wife let you see your daughter? You were such a pain in the ass, she had to throw you out so you wouldn't be a bad influence on the kid.

Unlike you, I'm there for my son. I get up in the middle of the night and give him his medicine, give him his supplements every day so his condition may improve. Have you cured your daughter's Asperger's as I did with my younger son? It was pretty simple, a few rounds of chelation.

Yet, here you sit with your bullshit pseudoscience degree thinking you know something about the autistic spectrum. Your kid is still fucked up from mercury poisoning and you're celebrating it.

Sure, claim I have a personality disorder because I point out your blatant stupidity in refusing to learn the truth about what ASD's are. Meanwhile, I cure the conditions because I have the ability to reason, something you'll never have.

The ability to reason is what allowed me to earn a 200% return on my money over the last 6 days with a very conservative investment strategy. I only try to earn 10% per day so you can see I exceded my goals.

I approach autism with a similar strategy, small gains that equal large gains over time. If you tried to achieve small gains for yourself, perhaps one day, you would could present yourself as a recovered nitwit. Then you could appreciate that you should prevent your daughter from becoming a future nitwit like you and your ex-wife.

By John Best, at 9:42 AM
Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "How often does your daffy ex-wife let you see your daughter? You were such a pain in the ass, she had to throw you out so you wouldn't be a bad influence on the kid."

There you go again, lying like the complete idiot that you are. Firstly, we agreed to split up because we had fallen out of love. It happens. I'm surprised your wife hasn't admitted to you that she thinks you're a total piece of shit - but then, hardly surprising since you'd probably have her horsewhipped for doing so (such is the disturbance of your personality!). My daughter and I see each other whenever we like. That's the way we worked it when my ex-wife and I split up, and it remains the same. As for the intluence I am on my daughter, I have a letter from an eminent child psychologist in the UK, who testifies to the fact that my ex-wife and I are in fact both very good parents to our child. We wouldn't even think of institutionalising our child, John: we aren't that fucking cruel and disgusting.

Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "Meanwhile, I cure the conditions because I have the ability to reason, something you'll never have."

LoL! Ability to reason, my arse!!!!

Plently of evidence on your excuse of a blog to suggest that you and reason do not live on even the same continent, let alone in the same fucking house!!!! I need a break for a minute or I'll piss myself laughing at you! Ever thought of a career in stand-up?

Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "The ability to reason is what allowed me to earn a 200% return on my money over the last 6 days with a very conservative investment strategy. I only try to earn 10% per day so you can see I exceded my goals."

The spelling is exceeded. Is that the same 'ability to reason' that failed to earn you anything the other day?

Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "Sure, claim I have a personality disorder because I point out your blatant stupidity in refusing to learn the truth about what ASD's are."

Actually:

a- I haven't claimed that you have one, per se, although I have demonstrated that you would most likely fit the criteria for the diagnosis; and,

b- you fit the criteria purely because that is what your behaviour suggests, dipshit.

Given your inane rants and a comprehensive study of the available literature, I'm confident that what I know about autism is far better than what you are - at best - guessing. I'm qualified. You are not. Get used to it.

Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "Then you could appreciate that you should prevent your daughter from becoming a future nitwit like you and your ex-wife."

Hmmm... thus says a criminal psychopath. Reader, judge for yourself!

Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "Have you cured your daughter's Asperger's as I did with my younger son?"

Pointless question: you haven't cured anyone, John... not even yourself of your stupidity.

Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "Yet, here you sit with your bullshit pseudoscience degree thinking you know something about the autistic spectrum. Your kid is still fucked up from mercury poisoning and you're celebrating it."

LoL again! Firstly, at least I actually have a degree (something you have so far failed to prove that you have!), and secondly... she's not fucked up from any poisoning, you dumb get! LoL

Shitting Jesus... how can you be so stupid with only one brain????

Heh... just realised!!!

Gambling Addict said: "I only try to earn 10% per day so you can see I exceded my goals."

If you're gambling every day, you're basically an addict!!!!

Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "It was pretty simple, a few rounds of chelation."

Chelation? Rubbing an ineffectual cream on your son's skin??? The guy who told you that was chelation saw you coming!!!!

Jesus H. Christ and sidecar, John .... you're an absolute idiot! WHat a waste of a good wank you were. Your dad must have regretted that shag!

(cool word verification: sure robo :P )

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 1:54 PM
Fat Nitwit,
You don't have to consider an asylum for your kid because she's not as brain damaged by mercury as my kid was. Of course, my other son who had the same diagnosis as your kid is cured now so we know he has no chance of growing up to be a neuronitwit like you.

Would you call people who play the stock market every day gambling addicts or investors? I don't care because I earned another 24% today so you can call me names while I count my cash if you like. That's 275% in 7 days. How long would it take you to earn 275% from a bank, Dimwit?

By John Best, at 4:41 PM
SkumBag: "You don't have to consider an asylum for your kid because she's not as brain damaged by mercury as my kid was. Of course, my other son who had the same diagnosis as your kid is cured now so we know he has no chance of growing up to be a neuronitwit like you."

You think you need to consider one for Sam? If that's Sam in your pic, it's not a fucking 'asylum' (as you call it) he needs! He needs a dad who's not fucking deranged.

ForesSkin: "Would you call people who play the stock market every day gambling addicts or investors? I don't care because I earned another 24% today so you can call me names while I count my cash if you like. That's 275% in 7 days. How long would it take you to earn 275% from a bank, Dimwit?"

You're still nowhere near what I made during my training years, John. So don't bother trying to show off. You can't.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:26 PM
What were you training?

By John Best, at 8:10 PM
"The 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms. That means I can blow your head off if you ever step on my property and it's legal."

Ok Best, let's talk about the 2nd amendment.

To start of with, here is a question. What weapons do you think you should be allowed to own?

By Anonymous, at 8:58 PM
Demonic Nitwit,
Anything short of nukes. We have enemies in DC and they need to be ousted right now.

By John Best, at 10:11 PM
"Demonic Nitwit,
Anything short of nukes. We have enemies in DC and they need to be ousted right now."

First of all, that's Mr. Demonic Nitwit to you.

Second, does this mean the individual should own chemical weapons like mustard gas?

Does this mean the individual should own biological weapons?

Should you be free to create your own biological weapon? What happens if this weapon goes out of control?

Does this mean you should be able to bury live land mines on your property?

Should you as an individual be able to own your own non-nuclear missle that can destroy whole buildings.

Should you be free to construct a dirty bomb? It's a radiological weapon by the way and not a nuclear weapon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiological_weapon.

By Anonymous, at 11:13 PM
"We have enemies in DC and they need to be ousted right now."

Oh? Did you run for public office? That's the only way to do it. It's called democracy.

By Matt Hogan, at 11:34 PM
Demon,
Don't you understand that our govt. is ignoring the constitution? Has it dawned on you that we give them the power they have and that we have an obligation to take that power back when they abuse it? Do you know that the govt. works for us, not the other way around?

Do you understand the word "your", as in MY property. Damn right I can put land mines there if I want to, and I don't need to put warning signs in Spanish either.

Do you have any idea how corrupt our govt. has become? We the people need to be as well armed as our enemies in DC. So yes, we should have all of the weapons you describe and more.

By John Best, at 11:37 PM
Matt,
We don't live in a democracy now. We used to, not anymore. Can you tell me why that's true?

By John Best, at 11:39 PM
Heh! I comment, and Best concentrates on David and ignores me. Coward!

Unlike you, I'm there for my son. I get up in the middle of the night and give him his medicine, give him his supplements every day so his condition may improve.

And do absolutely nothing otherwise. Liar.

Meanwhile, I cure the conditions because I have the ability to reason, something you'll never have.

You haven't cured anyone and you've never proved it. Your "reason" is skewed because you THINK you have the universal solution, when reality dictates that you are way off the mark. Not only have you never proven it's a cure by producing verified PROVEN cured children, you have refused to acknowledge the truth of what I have said in relation to the improvement in Sam. All because - again - it reveals your failure. You fear failure, and you fear me because I expose that failure on my website (where you can't see it yourself) and on the forum about you (which you CAN see).

The ability to reason is what allowed me to earn a 200% return on my money over the last 6 days with a very conservative investment strategy. I only try to earn 10% per day so you can see I exceded my goals.

Gambling an investment stragedy?? There's another example of your "ability to reason". NOT!

I approach autism with a similar strategy

And that is another example of ultimate failure.....

You don't have to consider an asylum for your kid because she's not as brain damaged by mercury as my kid was.

If Sam is brain damaged, it was by untreated intestinal pain for seven years, not by mercury.

Of course, my other son who had the same diagnosis as your kid is cured now so we know he has no chance of growing up to be a neuronitwit like you.

There is no older son. Repeat - there is no older son.

Would you call people who play the stock market every day gambling addicts or investors?

Speaking for myself - I call them gamblers. Especially at the moment. Banks are safer - especially in Australia. I would prefer the stock market be shut down completely and the wealth shared properly - through employment.

Finally - if there was a problem in Washington, there is a process to follow. There has to be. Find it.

By Anonymous, at 4:48 AM
Amazingly Stupid Prepuce: "What were you training?"

I was training as an educational psychologist, which training was completed in Sept 2006, and the degree for which it was undertaken was awarded in Dec 2006.

Have to ask: how stupid are you? This stuff's already been told before!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:29 AM
Prepuce Stupidus: "We don't live in a democracy now. We used to, not anymore. Can you tell me why that's true?"

Because fuckwits like you might try running for office? LoL

Sorry folks... couldn't resist that!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:33 AM
FuckWad: "Damn right I can put land mines there if I want to, and I don't need to put warning signs in Spanish either."

Actually ... I wouldn't be too sure about that.

PenisMince: "We don't live in a democracy now. We used to, not anymore. Can you tell me why that's true?"

Because of the threat to democracy posed by people as fucking loony as you?

LoL ... sorry, peeps ... having too much fun here!!! That guy missed his true calling, didn't he?: straight-man for a comedian!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:38 AM
Andrews,
When the subject was horses, you claimed to have made lots of money during your training years. It follows that you were training horses yourself and making lots of money at it. If you were paid to be a student, you should have made that clear.

Timetwerp,
I have 3 kids. The oldest has autism. The next one had Asperger's. The third is fine.

Sam's intestinal problems lasted about 4 years, not 7. You can't read and confused the fact that it took 7 years from diagnosis until I was able to chelate which had nothing to do with the bowel problems. However, chelation inexpectedly cured the bowel problems, something a herd of soctors kept telling me they could do nothing about. I suppose you could have cured those bowel problems?

Intelligent people play the stock market and make lots of money at it. Morons like you would lose. I've doubled my money on stocks a few times but it takes a lot longer to do that than it does playing horses.

I didn't reply to you because most of what you say is the same stupid thing. You're too damn stupid to take seriously.

By John Best, at 8:07 AM
Hey Best

I posted this on your blog twice, Best but alas you didn't let it through. I will post it here.

Actually no you don't have the right to just say anything you want.

1. Do you have the right to scream out fire in a movie theatre and it causes a mass panic?

2. Do you have the right to yell out "there is a bomb on a passenger airplane" and cause a mass panic?

People's lives come before your freedom of speech and the guy from Boston's speech numb nuts.

Best, you do not have the right to incite terrorism and mass panic.

We have three rights that our constitution is based upon which is in our declaration of independence.

1. We have the right to life.
2. We have the right to liberty.
3. We have the right to pursue happiness

There are two more premises that are missing from this but come from John Locke himself.

4. Premise 3 is true if and only if it does not violate premises 1 and 2

5. Premise 2 is true if and only if it does not violate premise 1.

My life, Phil's life, David Andrew's life, ABFH, and other people's lives comes before your liberty best.

You say you have the right to put land mines in your yard. What happens if children who are playing baseball in the street, knock their baseball into your yard, one actually goes to get their baseball, and the kid fucking blow up. I am sure the mother of this kid would have something to say about your liberty then.

Here is anothe example Best that you failed to put on your poor excuse for a blog.

What about the Typhoid Mary Case? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Mallon. This is a classic example of a liberty that had to be taken away from an individual named Mary Mallon. Her liberty was endangering lives Best. She was spreading typhoid Best through her cooking. She was trying to claim that her rights and liberties were being violated. She lost on that one and I am glad she did. I am glad her liberties were violated to save people's lives.

I asked if you had the right to own biological, chemical, and radiological weapons(dirty bombs). You claim yes you do. In addition, you claim you have the right to develop your own biological weapon. This biological weapon that you supposedly have the right to create can become out of control and millions can fucking die Best. Is this what you fucking want Best?

No Best, you do not have these rights that you claim.

If I knew and had proof you were actually developing biological weapons in your basement, I would have the duty as an American Citizen myself to call the authorities to come and stop you.

In addition, until the authorities came I have the duty and right to come onto your property and detain you.

Do you want to know why Best I have the right and duty? This is because people's lives come before your fucking liberty, property rights, and freedom Best based upon Lockean principals.

By Anonymous, at 8:51 AM
"When the subject was horses, you claimed to have made lots of money during your training years. It follows that you were training horses yourself and making lots of money at it. If you were paid to be a student, you should have made that clear."

Yes, it seems I should have .... because you were too stupid to figure that the subject was actually INCOME!

You dopey old chavvy sod!

LoL

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 9:25 AM
Dimwit Demon,
Go arrest Obama for not outlawing the biological weapons contained in vaccines.

Do you approve of our govt. making the same weapons? Who allows the govt. to do that? You allow that when you vote for people like Obama and McCain. Since the govt. works for us, and it is unconstitutional for them to restrict anyone's weapons, we are not bound by their rules. They are bound by what we tell them, not ask them, to do. Do you understand that?

The govt. has forgotten this lately and they need to be reminded that they have overstepped their bounds. We have an obligation to reign them in and put them all in their place. Otherwise, we accept being slaves to them and that's not the way this country is supposed to work.

Do you think Obama's anti-gun plan is going to keep any guns out of the hands of criminals? All it can accomplish is to take weapons away from law abiding citizens, the same citizens who might need those weapons to restore this country to what it once was, where we were not continually robbed and our children poisoned by our own damn govt..

Do you like paying taxes and then watching your govt. send all of our jobs to China while they keep allowing illegal immigrants to come in here and keep wages low so the rich get richer? It seems to me that when that bullshit keeps happening that our govt. is not looking out for our interests.

You have a lot to learn, kid. Stop worrying about the minor details and look at the big picture. Your govt. is absolutely corrupt and it needs to go.

By John Best, at 9:27 AM
"In addition, you claim you have the right to develop your own biological weapon."

Cube, the good news is that the only biological weapon that yon Chavvy Prepuce can muster is a shitload of - well - shit, basically. That is the sum total of biological weaponry he could possibly develop: it's what he flings at the walls when he's not typing shit on the internet!

LoL

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 9:28 AM
Best

No, I believe you're missing my point about our very constitution and everything constructed by our founding fathers.

The truth is when our founding fathers constructed our constitution our founding fathers had major disagreements on everything. They had to come to major compromises.

The truth is best is life comes before liberty and liberty comes before estate(pursuit of happiness).

First, Everyone here is harping about liberties and pursuit of happiness so much they forget about the first one and that is life itself.

Second, premises 4 and 5 were not included in the original construction of our constitution.

4. Liberty comes before estate(Pursuit of happiness)

5. Life comes before Liberty and Estate(Pursuit of happiness)

Most people in this country including you think of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness as having equal weight when this is not supposed to be the case.

Life > Liberty > Estate(Pursuit of happiness)

In essence Best, our constitution is flawed and has been flawed since it's inception and my argument is that our whole constitution is unconstitutional.

In my opinion, our whole constitution needs to be rewritten from scratch.

Most of our problems would be resolved if premises 4 and 5 were included.

Ten years ago, I would've agreed with everything you said about our constitution but now I do not.

Even if you and your revolutionaries got what you want and supposedly restored the constitution, what would that accomplish? Would it resolve any of our major gaping flaws that I pointed out? No, it would not and your revolution would be a puric victory indeed.

Best, once you decide to make biological weapons in your basement you become a threat to people's lives. What safeguards would you put in place to prevent your weapon from becoming a global pandemic and this weapon kills 75% of the world's population.

This is another reason why your revolution would be a puric victory. This would mean you and your revolutonaries could win but at too great of a cost.

By Anonymous, at 10:26 AM
Let's extend this out further Best. What if your biological weapon killed off the whole human race?

Then your revolution again was all for naught and again it was a puric victory.

Quite to the contrary, I do see the bigger picture and guess what the bigger picture is very scary indeed.

By Anonymous, at 11:03 AM
Cube... sorry to tell you this but all your rather excellent debating skills are wasted on Prepuce-Chav: he doesn't think at quite that advanced a level, nor does he think with reference to people other than himself.

I can see what you mean, but I doubt he can. Let's face it... he's been told what university I got my M. Ed. from and he still writes that I got it from somewhere else!

Intelligent debate is wasted on him.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 11:52 AM
Cubed Nitwit,
Are you truly so stupid that you missed the point of everything I said?

The people in power are not paying any attention to the Constitution. Wake up.

Fat Bastard,
Worry about Finland you ignorant fuck.

By John Best, at 4:59 PM
Prepuce Ignorantus: "Fat Bastard,
Worry about Finland you ignorant fuck."

LoL

That the best you can do, man? Jesus bollocks!!!! You're fucking useless.

Sad thing is this: you actually do have a good point - the people in power in any country pretty much fail to regard the relevant constitutions of those countries, although not really in the way that you seem to mean (or at least to the extent that your paranoid mind suggests to you).

But you manage to fuck so much up purely because of your being a total arsehole, and that's the sad thing! You talk so much bollocks that you can't be taken seriously.

Cube raises some excellent points but you can't be arsed to think that deeply - and that's your fucking problem, so now you know! So get the fuck over it and start thinking properly. That way you might actually do your country some fucking good!

As for Finland, I do absolutely worry about it, purely because it's where I live and it's a land I love, but the people here are so fucking seriously obedience-trained that they tend to be unable to make decisions without asking a superior about how to fucking decide.

(nice word verification - looks almost like it's a Finnish word: lattioma!)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:21 PM
Oh, and - Best - the ignorant fuck is you!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:22 PM
All quotes are from the brain dead John Best Junior (Fore Sam)

I have 3 kids. The oldest has autism. The next one had Asperger's. The third is fine.

You have two. There is no one older than Sam, you liar.

Sam's intestinal problems lasted about 4 years, not 7.

Quote from your own blog: "Sam had always walked with a limp, dragging one leg behind the other."

Emphasis on always. 4 years my arse! Either way it was WAY too long! And damage was done as a result.

However, chelation inexpectedly cured the bowel problems, something a herd of soctors kept telling me they could do nothing about. I suppose you could have cured those bowel problems?

Yes I could have - by stopping talking about Autism as the problem. That's what you did - you blamed it all on Autism. Now who's fault is that? Ever heard of a barium meal? Bound to be a child's version, and a way to do it when a child won't eat as Sam wouldn't. You failed to pursue all options correctly.

Intelligent people play the stock market and make lots of money at it.

And that's why the US economy is up the shit. Because the rich aren't sharing with the poor. That's not intelligent - that's just plain greedy and wrong.

I didn't reply to you because most of what you say is the same stupid thing. You're too damn stupid to take seriously.

No, you are scared of me because I know the truth and because I am for more intelligent than you can handle.

Go arrest Obama for not outlawing the biological weapons contained in vaccines.

You're crazy! There aren't any!

You have a lot to learn, kid.

I've said this before - Cube Demon is an adult.

Are you truly so stupid that you missed the point of everything I said?

You paid no attention to what Cube Demon said, Best.

The people in power are not paying any attention to the Constitution.

On the contrary, if that was true they'd be shutting you up without a second thought, Best! Along with Age of Autism, Generation Rescue and that fat turd from Boston!

By Anonymous, at 5:51 PM
For Matt Hogan;

America isn't a true democracy because only a minority (less than 50 percent) votes at elections. A true democracy can only result if every adult votes.

Make voting compulsory. That will solve that problem. It's what makes Australia great in that regard and it would have prevented the joke that was Florida in 2000 as well as had Bush thrown out in 2004 if he had won in 2000 to begin with.

By Anonymous, at 5:54 PM
Timetard,
You really have to learn how to read and reason. You're simply too stupid to talk to.

Fat Bastard,
You're the asshole who spreads false information about autism. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

By John Best, at 6:59 PM
"Fat Bastard,
You're the asshole who spreads false information about autism. You ought to be ashamed of yourself."

Fucking Norah, Prepuce!!! Is that really the best you can do? Even when someone tells you that you actually make at least something of a good point? Fucking hell fire - you're a lousy bollocks, aren't you?

PSMLMFAHOH!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:03 PM
So talk to him, John. You're as stupid as you say he is.

"Go arrest Obama for not outlawing the biological weapons contained in vaccines."

That's reason? John, there are no weapons in vaccines for God's sake!

Timelord, a true democracy means freedom of choice. Any order denies that freedom. You shouldn't have to vote if you don't want to.

By Matt Hogan, at 7:43 PM
Matt,
Vaccines are being used as weapons. But, you're one of the idiots who touts the lie that vaccines cause no harm so I don't expect you to agree. Remain an idiot, I don't care.

Fat Bastard,
Not much use in talking to you, either.

By John Best, at 9:52 PM
"Cubed Nitwit,
Are you truly so stupid that you missed the point of everything I said?

The people in power are not paying any attention to the Constitution. Wake up."

Best, this is the 2nd time I have said this but you've missed my point.

Let me try it from this angle. Let's say you're successful in your revolution. You restore the constitution.

Guess what it's going to solve nothing. The constitution itself is fucking flawed. It's been flawed since it's inception by our founding fathers. It does not include two premises I have discussed to make it complete and in line with Lockean principles.

So if you won your revolution it would be a puric victory. Do you not understand what I am saying to you Best?

Maybe Mr. Andrews is right. You're stuck on your bullshit that you refuse to learn anything new or to learn new ideas at all. You are stagnant is what you are Best.

Phil was right about you Best. You are a threat and a dangerous man by your stated words here and your actions in the past.

Personally, I think you have a psychopathic mind with an extreme sense of entitlement but I am no pscyhologist. Mr. Andrews would know more.

By Anonymous, at 10:29 PM
Best

I do think you mean everything you say. In your mind, you really believe you have the right to a biological, chemical, or radiological weapon. I have the feeling that if you were able to make one, you would do so.

This scares the crap out of me.

Best, I have read most of your posts on your blog and else where and Phil was and is still right about everything he has said about you.

You have incited terrorists to attack this country Best. I am sure the FBI is watching you very closely. I know I would if I was them.

Best, my social skills are shot to hell but one thing that seems to be intact is my danger instinct and my danger instinct is showing red flags big time.

Best, I am sure that if I saw you in person you would display one of the few facial expressions I can detect clearly and that is contempt.

Contempt is a quality of the psychopathic mind and you want me to give you my address. Hell Fucking No!!!!

I have no doubt my family and my loved ones would be in danger of you.

By Anonymous, at 10:41 PM
"Vaccines are being used as weapons. But, you're one of the idiots who touts the lie that vaccines cause no harm so I don't expect you to agree. Remain an idiot, I don't care."

Vaccines save lives you fuck up! Who's the idiot? God, you need a refresher in sense!

By Matt Hogan, at 10:57 PM
Hey Best, I am looking back at all of your threads especially at this one:

http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=360

I can't fucking belive this. You're teaching your LFA child who does not know any social nuance of who to hit and not to hit at all how to fucking fight. This is paraphrasing Kassiane.

Kassiane is 110% right about everything she has said to you on there.

I am so flabbergasted at this. I am so speechless now.

Personally, I think Kassiane deserves a gold medal.

Another thing on there is I notice you enjoy fighting and think it's fun. This means you seem to get off on hurting people. Another trait of the psychopathic mind.

Mr. Andrews, I am collating all of this together. One of the things I am good at is noticing patterns of behavior over a long period of time by observation, behavior, and what they say.

Best, I have dealt with people like you in my past and you are all nothing but cowards and bullies.

By Anonymous, at 11:10 PM
"Fat Bastard,
Not much use in talking to you, either."

LoL!!!! Prepucium Chavium can only manage that? Wow!!! Looks like I fucking owned him! NICE! :D

Cube said: "Personally, I think you have a psychopathic mind with an extreme sense of entitlement but I am no pscyhologist. Mr. Andrews would know more."

Well, as we've seen elsewhere, Best's behaviour and discernible attitudes do line up well with the criteria for a personality disorder of a very convoluted type. And chances are that it is now so ingrained in his personality structure that it is impossible to do anything much to help him to become a person more amenable to listening to - and learning from - other people's argnuments.

Matt said: "Timelord, a true democracy means freedom of choice. Any order denies that freedom. You shouldn't have to vote if you don't want to."

One way round that is to make it a civic duty to vote but to allow an option on the polling form that allows a vote of no confidence in any candidate. That in itself would give a more accurate representation of what the figures were than would abstention... you'd be able to include those who otherwise wouldn't even register for voting.

Cube said: "Best, I am sure that if I saw you in person you would display one of the few facial expressions I can detect clearly and that is contempt."

Best's only discernible facial expression (based on his photo) is that of 'gnarled old chav'!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 3:46 AM
Cube again: "Mr. Andrews, I am collating all of this together. One of the things I am good at is noticing patterns of behavior over a long period of time by observation, behavior, and what they say."

You'll get a lot of good data for this from his postings on the net. If you know how to develop a grounded theory, you'll come up with some interesting points, I can practically guarantee it.

If not, there are some good sites to find out how. Best one in my view is: http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/grounded.html

I use grounded theory methodology in my own work since it actually gives much more info that does, say, a purely quantitative investigation involving - for example - checklists.

Have to go now... taking my wee one to hospital from school because she has an OT assessment ongoing. The OT's nice ... I know her well; she's one of my students from a course I presented at the local Summer University back in 1999!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:13 AM
Timetard,
You really have to learn how to read and reason. You're simply too stupid to talk to.

I know how to read, and you're a fine one to talk about reason! You are totally lacking in reason - which explains your inability to debate with anyone let alone me. Cowards fall back on the "too stupid to talk to" excuse.

Fat Bastard,
You're the asshole who spreads false information about autism. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

No, Best - you have been spreading false information about Autism ever since you opened your pathetic blog. If anyone should hang their heads in shame it's you. We all know it. You're too stupid to realise it.

Vaccines are being used as weapons.

Oh they are not, Best!! You are seriously deranged and need to be locked up for such a ridiculous assertion!

Timelord, a true democracy means freedom of choice. Any order denies that freedom. You shouldn't have to vote if you don't want to.

Matt, freedom of choice includes deprivation of said choice by individuals. You can't approve of that surely? Order is actually better for equality, and provides more freedom for those who would be otherwise buried by those who are strong enough to do so. Such a freedom should be withdrawn - it's called bullying of those who are unable to defend themselves.

One way round that is to make it a civic duty to vote but to allow an option on the polling form that allows a vote of no confidence in any candidate. That in itself would give a more accurate representation of what the figures were than would abstention... you'd be able to include those who otherwise wouldn't even register for voting.

Hey now that's a good idea, David! I like it! In Australia we call those votes "informal". I know someone who does that.

By Anonymous, at 5:50 AM
Phil: "Hey now that's a good idea, David! I like it! In Australia we call those votes 'informal'."

See, Prepuce Stupidica says I can't come up with solutions to things but I invariably DO come up with them!

And good ones, too.

Can you believe Prepuce's riposte to me? Not exactly... scintillating, was it? He used to be able to do some good and funny ones... maybe his personality-disordered brain is also succumbing to toxins... like... I dunno... environmental mercury? ;)

What a twonk!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 9:35 AM
"If not, there are some good sites to find out how. Best one in my view is: http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/grounded."

Mr. Andrews, this might help me to actually take notes. I just took a quick glance at this and it gives me more detailed instructions on how to take notes.

When I went to a note taking class in college the class told me nothing. The language they used was so vague that I learned nothing in that one time class.

This looks like it would teach me a lot more.

I appreciate that Mr. Andrews.

Why couldn't they go through this methodology in elementary school, middle school, high school, and college?

It would've made things a heck of a lot easier if they went through this.

By Anonymous, at 10:45 AM
Cube Demon: "Mr. Andrews, this might help me to actually take notes. I just took a quick glance at this and it gives me more detailed instructions on how to take notes."

It's the one I used as part of the research methods literature review, and I also recommended it to my supervisee, whose Master's thesis is due in this year. I like the deatail it goes into, too; it is by far better than many other pages on the net that deal with the same topic.

Cube Demon: "When I went to a note taking class in college the class told me nothing. The language they used was so vague that I learned nothing in that one time class."

That's something I feel is really poor in a lot of educational institutions... when I was at Liverpool, the same thing prevailed: lack of support for students experiencing difficulties. It's even worse in Finland... you're spoon-fed what you learn in most places (thankfully, the psychology department of the University of Oulu was run by a brilliant professor who inspired his students to take more responsibility over their own learning), but - for those who have not been used to higher-educational learning - such assistance does not happen. Two clients have had their requests for support on such matters ignored by the one polytechnic they both attended.

You mention college... are you still in higher education, or have you graduated?

Cube Demon: "This looks like it would teach me a lot more."

I would hope so. I still re-read that paper to keep afresh with the things it contains.

Cube Demon: "I appreciate that Mr. Andrews."

Very welcome, Cube. I hope you find it rather useful in your endeavours.

Cube Demon: "Why couldn't they go through this methodology in elementary school, middle school, high school, and college?"

Don't know, but they really should. One text I have on the issue of study skills suggests that study skills should be embedded in the subject teaching, where the emphasis on relevance and application is clear; I would like to see the same applied to the teaching of methodology - sadly, it isn't so.

Cube Demon: "It would've made things a heck of a lot easier if they went through this."

Yes. I think so too.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 11:54 AM
Mr. Andrews

"thankfully, the psychology department of the University of Oulu was run by a brilliant professor who inspired his students to take more responsibility over their own learning"

I could not pick up anything from the lectures at all. One of my workarounds was that I had to take full responsibility for my own learning. Since, I gained nothing from the lectures I had to teach myself by reading the book and looking up information.

This meant I could only take 6-9 credits at a time which took longer to obtain my bachlor degree. There is a plus to this though. I think I learned alot more than the other students.

"you're spoon-fed what you learn in most places..."

Here the students are totally dependent on the teacher for their learning. Most do not go off and learn on their own.

"You mention college... are you still in higher education, or have you graduated?"
I obtained my bachleors. I am having major difficulties right now in my personel life which I would rather not discuss here. Best would use these difficulites against me and he would throw them onto his hateful blog.

Timelord knows about most of my major diffculties.

By the way though, as an aside, I think I have found an answer to x/0where x is not equal to 0. I am developing solid proof you can divide by 0.

By Anonymous, at 12:46 PM
Cube Demon: "I could not pick up anything from the lectures at all. One of my workarounds was that I had to take full responsibility for my own learning. Since, I gained nothing from the lectures I had to teach myself by reading the book and looking up information."

I had largely the same problem, and it's probably down to having a better visual memory than auditory one. For me, lectures have always been hard but - especially of a good 'reader text' is provided - I've done well learning from books, even though I'm fairly badly dyslexic sometimes... rest of the time, I'm just ... dyslexic in the reading and writing end of things.

Cube Demon: "This meant I could only take 6-9 credits at a time which took longer to obtain my bachlor degree. There is a plus to this though. I think I learned alot more than the other students."

I took my time partly because it was better for me, with the difficulties I've had; but also because the courses available were all part-time availablity only. Regarding the plus side you mention - I agree entirely.

Cube Demon: "Here the students are totally dependent on the teacher for their learning. Most do not go off and learn on their own."

Holy shit... that doesn't sound good. In other words, the ones who learn best should be the ones who experience difficulties, since those are the ones who take more responsibility for what they learn! Would be interesting to research that, wouldn't it?

Cube Demon: "I obtained my bachleors. I am having major difficulties right now in my personel life which I would rather not discuss here. Best would use these difficulites against me and he would throw them onto his hateful blog."

Good to hear about the bachelor's degree :) And I'd say you earned it well, too! I've seen some of the more obvious orthography-oriented issues you have to deal with in your posts on here, and I'm aware of how that can make one feel; unlike some, though, I go beyond that and will only ask for clarification if I really need it. Never had to yet with you :)

Cube Demon: "Timelord knows about most of my major diffculties."

Okay :) Good someone knows. I agree with your policy - not saying here what the issues are... Best is indeed bastard enough to do that which you suggest he would do.

Cube Demon: "By the way though, as an aside, I think I have found an answer to x/0 where x is not equal to 0. I am developing solid proof you can divide by 0."

Interesting!!! Would be interesting to read, although I have to say that it would take some convincing to shift me from the accepted notion that x/0 (for an x at all) is not defined.

In order to prove using a zero divisor, the best way forward as I see it is to use set theory, although your proof would largely be qualitative ratehr than quantitative: but then, how does oen count that which cannot be counted? (If a number exists that has not been defined, then it is by definition not provable by counting so a more qualitative approach to getting to grips with it must be used - at least, that's my feeling on the matter).

What was your bachelor's in?

My BA-equivalence (180sp) was in psychology (90sp), mathematical sciences (45sp), archaeology (30sp) and Finnish language (15sp).

(nice word verification: vibes)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 1:55 PM
Can you believe Prepuce's riposte to me? Not exactly... scintillating, was it? He used to be able to do some good and funny ones... maybe his personality-disordered brain is also succumbing to toxins... like... I dunno... environmental mercury? ;)

Hehehehehehehe!

Nah, he lacks originality. He just doesn't get out there anymore even on the Net because he's been banned left right and centre from places. No more life experience. What a shame - NOT!

You notice that he hasn't even responded. Bye bye, coward!

And actually I won't be responding for a week as from now - going on holiday!

By Anonymous, at 4:01 PM
Phl: "You notice that he hasn't even responded. Bye bye, coward!"

LoL - he'll try something stupid soon, so watch for it.

It'll be incredibly inane and possibly whingy.

Phil: "And actually I won't be responding for a week as from now - going on holiday!"

Nice one, Phil!!! Enjoy :D

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:52 PM
Demon,
If you met me, you'd just see me laughing at you, the same way I laugh at Andrews.

I remember when I first met Andrews and he used to go crying to moderators because he thought I was picking on him. At least now, he insults me so he has made some progress. That's a good thing, a mental case who's showing improvement.

You don't like the idea of fighting? Well, isn't that special. Fighting is fun, as are all contact sports where people hit each orher. I suppose you think I should teach my son to go crying for help like Andrews instead of defending himself. You people are all wacked.

Weapons are only a problem when they are in irresponsible hands...like our government's. We need the same weapons they have. Since your average citizen has no ulterior agenda that is paid for with bribes, we are a lot safer with weapons than the government is. I wouldn't shoot someone like you. When we fix the government, TV will tell you the truth that I already know and then you'll believe it. Then, you'll let people like me help you fix your brain.

By John Best, at 8:33 PM
"Demon,
If you met me, you'd just see me laughing at you, the same way I laugh at Andrews."

I am sure you would Best. You think you are superior to everyone on this earth.

"I remember when I first met Andrews and he used to go crying to moderators because he thought I was picking on him. At least now, he insults me so he has made some progress. That's a good thing, a mental case who's showing improvement."

You are a bully Best. You do not care about who you hurt at all. This is a common theme with you.

"You don't like the idea of fighting? Well, isn't that special. Fighting is fun, as are all contact sports where people hit each orher. I suppose you think I should teach my son to go crying for help like Andrews instead of defending himself. You people are all wacked."

Kassiane is correct about you. You are damn stupid. What if your kid hurts an innocent bystander? He doesn't know the social nuances of whom to fight and not fight. I am horribly mortified by this.

I can't FUCKING BELIEVE THIS. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?

"Weapons are only a problem when they are in irresponsible hands...like our government's. We need the same weapons they have. Since your average citizen has no ulterior agenda that is paid for with bribes, we are a lot safer with weapons than the government is. I wouldn't shoot someone like you. When we fix the government, TV will tell you the truth that I already know and then you'll believe it. Then, you'll let people like me help you fix your brain."

If anyone's brain needs fixing it is your brain. You're teaching a child the knowledge to fight who right now does not have the wisdom to use it.

Answer me this Best. How in the fuck does my brain need fixing when I know this and you apparently do not? I'm 29 years old, just a few years older than Kassiane, and we both know this. How can you as a man in his 50's not realize this?

Martial Arts experts will tell you the same thing.

By Anonymous, at 10:12 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By John Best, at 10:25 PM
"Foresam said...
Cubed Nitwit,
I'm not a bully. I just put child abusers in their place. You see, everyone associated with Neuroinsanity is a child abuser. When they spread bogus information about autism, some parents might listen to that bullshit and miss a chance to help their autistic child. Ergo, those kids who will miss a chance to be cured are suffering needlessly because of you bunch of idiots."

Best, your so called cure is a form of quackery. Autism is not mercury poisoning. Let's say for the argument you're correct.

Best, you're doing a very dangerous procedure. Chelation if not done right can fuck someone up permanently.

You do not have a medical degree. Even if Dr. Andy Cutler is right he is still a medical Doctor am I correct? Shouldn't he and other Doctors be the one to do Chelation and not you? This means you and your followers need to prove that Autism is Mercury poisioning through the scientific method and double blind tests.

I've already suggested a double blind test which is my challenge. You're a big man on the internet challenging people left and right but when challenged yourself you back down.

"My son is gentle as a lamb, would never bother anyone. But, if someone messes with him, he is strong as a bull and will fight back. That will serve him well if he does have to be asylumized someday and some deranged attendants try to mess with him."

I am sure he is gentle as a lamb like you say right now. What happens though if your son has a meltdown? Here is a possibility.

Some innocent bystander could be wearing something that could trigger a meltdown. What do you think will happen?

"Kassiane has a nice ass, don't you think? Did you see the half naked pictures of her that her boyfriend had on his blog? It's a shame she uses it to thunk though."

1. There is no such word as asylumized. The correct word is institutionalized.

2. The word is not thunk it's think. You used the wrong verb tense. Thunk is supposed to be used for the past tense.

3. You're a sick man Best. By this comment, you do not respect anyone or anything. None of us are perfect and we all have our faults. I am no exception to this. I, on the other hand, do have remorse if I know that I have done someone wrong by mistake. I feel like shit if I do something wrong or if I accidently offended and not meant to. You on the other do not give a fuck who you hurt or offend. You have no shame or remorse for anything at all.

I don't know the situation between Kassiane and her boyfriend but that is none of my business.

All you're trying to do is just divert the argument.

I know your tricks Best. I know you have an extremely over-inflated ego. You are trying to make me angry enough into providing you with my address and other personnel information. That will not work.

I laugh at you Best. You are nothing but a clown. In fact, I think you should be in the circus. If I ever met you face to face I would laugh at you right to your face.

Best, if I won the challenge that I proposed to you, you should dress as a clown and you sit on a platform and people should have a chance to dunk the clown by hitting the target. What do you say Best? You're a funny man Best. You think you can make me angry. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You're nothing but a joke Best! You're a funny little man Best! I mock you and will mock you every day that I can on here.

By Anonymous, at 11:40 PM
Demon,
You gave this round to me by criticizing a typo, only a real idiot would do that.

It's not possible to fuck someone up permanently who is already fucked up with autism. All you can do is make the condition better. When people began using chelation, it was a can't lose situation. These kids had always been hopeless cases. Now, many of them are normal and lots of others are much improved.

All your DBCS will do is waste more time and make it more difficult to cure the kids. The younger they are when you start, the better their chances.

I'm 100% certain autism is mercury poisoning. If you want to play this game on the side of the liars, that's your business. The leaders of ND all know they are nothing but propaganda merchants. They're all 100% certain that autism is mercury poisoning too. That's why keep dreaming up such stupid arguments against the facts. They must have something to gain by trying to deny the truth.

The truth is chelation cures it so, that's it, end of debate. Talking to you folks is just a waste of time but I do enjoy seeing the rank stupidity and dishonesty taken to absurd lengths.
Plus, there is a slim chance I can help some young people escape from following this crazed cult and learn how to help themselves.

I don't have any ego. I just watched insanity for all these years and I'm not about to listen to any of it. The thing that tells you ND is insane is that no sane person would ever argue against curing autism. It makes no sense. But, when you live with brain damage, it's tough for you to see sanity. Good luck.

By John Best, at 12:06 AM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 3:18 AM
Prepuce Ignoramus: "I remember when I first met Andrews and he used to go crying to moderators because he thought I was picking on him. At least now, he insults me so he has made some progress. That's a good thing, a mental case who's showing improvement."

I tried the proper way to deal with a basic fuck-up net-troll, which IS to do it through moderators. Let's face it, Prepuce, you've been kicked off SO many people's blogs and other sites - even those run by people whose side you claim to be on! That in itself is very telling: I'm not the mental case - YOU are!

Prepuce Ignoramus: "I suppose you think I should teach my son to go crying for help like Andrews instead of defending himself."

If we were face to face and I even attempted to attack you (which you'd definitely provoke, since that's in your fucked up mentality to do so), you'd go whinging and crying on that lousy excuse for a blog! "The Fat Bastard tried to hit me!" you'd be fucking whinging. Who can win with a fucking crybaby like you? And - quite frankly - have you ever had a fucking beating you did not deserve? All those beatings with rosaries that you claimed the nuns used to give you... you know why? Because you fucking deserved every one of them, Prepuce!

Prepuce Ego-Inflatorius: "Then, you'll let people like me help you fix your brain."

LoL You couldn't even fix a fucking cup of tea properly!

Cube: "Best, you're doing a very dangerous procedure. Chelation if not done right can fuck someone up permanently."

He kows this - he's been told it for ages. He's just too stupid to take it on board. What do we expect from an fucking old chav with no sense of shame and an over-inflated ego?

Cube: "You do not have a medical degree."

He doesn't - until he can demonstrate otherwise - have any fucking degree, Cube... not even a fucking temperature! LoL

Cube: "Even if Dr. Andy Cutler is right he is still a medical Doctor am I correct?"

You'll love this one, Cube... Andy Cutler Ph. D. is an inorganic chemist! Nothing to do with medicine!

Cube: "Shouldn't he and other Doctors be the one to do Chelation and not you?"

So, because of my previous point, Cutler shouldn't even be offering advice like that to people, even to complete dimwits like Prepuce. In fact, especially not to dim pillocks like Prepuce!

Cube: "This means you and your followers need to prove that Autism is Mercury poisioning through the scientific method and double blind tests."

They've had ample time to do this and they have failed, and they've even tried to get their opposition to do their work for them! Lazy twats! LoL

Cube: "I don't know the situation between Kassiane and her boyfriend but that is none of my business."

I know a wee bit and - basically - he was an obnoxious piece of shit in what he did. Other than that, it's Kassianne's business. Definitely not Prepuce's.

Prepuce Ignoramus: "All your DBCS will do is waste more time and make it more difficult to cure the kids."

Who the fuck are you trying to kid? If you can't accept that the only way to know what is happening is through scientific trial, then that's your fucking issue for your fucked up brain, Prepuce. DBCS is the gold standard in evidence-based medicine, and in clinical & health psychology. It's not without its flaws, but it's fucking shitloads better than the JBJr method: find any idiot with the wrong degree and take medical advice from him because you're too stupid to do things correctly.

Prepuce Ignominius: "The truth is chelation cures it so, that's it, end of debate."

Wrong actually. That is not the truth and it has never been proven to be the truth. Not even close!

Prepuce Analis: "I don't have any ego."

Wrong again! You're all fucking ego and fuck all intellect. Bad mix, to be honest. You're to be pitied more than blamed though.

Prepuce Unintelligenticus Egotisticus: "They're all 100% certain that autism is mercury poisoning too. That's why keep dreaming up such stupid arguments against the facts."

So fucking wrong it's laughable! LoL

Nobody with any sense thinks that autism and mercury poisoning are even 'related by marriage', let alone linked in any closer manner! Projection going on there, Prepuce! You need to watch what you say - yo're letting people know too much about how idiotic you actually are.

Cube: "Best, if I won the challenge that I proposed to you, you should dress as a clown and you sit on a platform and people should have a chance to dunk the clown by hitting the target."

The challenge you put is a perfectly legitimate way to test a hypothesis. That is why Prepuce doesn't want to do it. He knows it would prove him wrong and his ego is too bound up with this fucked-up idea about mercury and autism. That's why he has to project as he does (see above). In fact, I gave him an opportunity to let the world know how his cure was working with his son... seriously! I'm an international associate editor for a peer-reviewed journal. And I was offering him a chance to describe - in a properly conducted study - what he was doing, how it was being done and what the results were. He as much as told me to 'fuck off'! Ungrateful shitty-arsed old chav, that he is.

Cube: "All you're trying to do is just divert the argument."

That's all he ever does. That's his real mission wherever he goes. That way, he can at least delay the truth; but it's like anything of a delaying tactic - eventually, the truth catches you and then you have to deal with it face on. And that sares the fucking shit out of Prepuce, because - huge as his ego is - it's too brittle to cope with the disappointment of being wrong.

Cube: "How can you as a man in his 50's not realize this?"

Because he's too thick to realise anything! Purely and simply that.

Edit:

Question: why would someone wanting to convince the world of a fantastic cure for autism not want to demonstrate that cure in a properly conducted study?

Anybody want to ask their research methods lecturers/professors? It would be interesting to hear from some new voices, especially undergraduate and postgraduate students undergoing research training.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 3:22 AM
Yippee! I saw Singer on the news and immediately thought of you. LOL

By Attila the Mom, at 8:20 AM
P.S. Riddle of the day.

What kind of Asshat uses his child's photo as his profile pic?

One who views his child as a possession and not a person, that's who.

By Attila the Mom, at 8:22 AM
Attila the Mom (on profile): "I have the body of an 18-year-old, but it's in the trunk of my car and it's starting to smell."

LoL

You're mad, I tell you! Maaaaad!!!!!

You should put them in the freezer, lass... the last longer and smell less!!! ;)

But the real riddle of the day is this:

What kind of prick says I look like Aqualung (presumably meaning old, gnarled and ugly and scruffy), and then puts a picture with his own face in it on his fucking profile?! Shitting Norah - he makes me look like Harrison bleeding Ford!!!!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 8:48 AM
Fat Bastard,
If I was wrong about mercury causing autism, chelation would not have worked at all to help my son. I would not have continued it and he would never have improved at all. Many jackasses like you have asked me to present proof aside from my words. I have invited lots of them to come to my house and see for themselves but none have come. So, we see that the stupid questions that pretend to doubt the successes of chelation are disingenuous. The assholes who ask those questions have no intention of admitting that they are aware of the blessing that chelation has been for so many autistic kids.

I love this reasoning, Fatso. You make no attempt to discredit the fact that autism is mercury poisoning, you only hurl insults.

"Prepuce Unintelligenticus Egotisticus: "They're all 100% certain that autism is mercury poisoning too. That's why keep dreaming up such stupid arguments against the facts."

"So fucking wrong it's laughable! LoL

Nobody with any sense thinks that autism and mercury poisoning are even 'related by marriage', let alone linked in any closer manner! Projection going on there, Prepuce! You need to watch what you say - yo're letting people know too much about how idiotic you actually are."

If autism isn't mercury poisoning, what is it, Chubs? You must have some idea with all of your alleged education on the subject.

By John Best, at 8:51 AM
Holy Shitting Jesus!!!! The Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard is back... and he's forgotten to put his teeth in!

"You make no attempt to discredit the fact that autism is mercury poisoning, you only hurl insults."

I don't have to attempt to discredit the idea that autism is mercury poisoning here because:

a- I did that fucking AGES ago; and,

b- the Vaccine Court Special Masters came to the same conclusion as the huge number of scientific teams all over the world have reached (i. e., that autism is not, has not been, and never ever will be, mercury poisoning!).

UCG-W, what the fuck is so pissing hard to get about that?

UCG-W shat, and out came this: "If autism isn't mercury poisoning, what is it, Chubs? You must have some idea with all of your alleged education on the subject."

I've already published on that elsewhere. Not that you'd understand it, UglyChavGit-Wizzard. Beyond your ability to understand.

But if autism actually was mercury poisoning... wouldn't you expect them to have the same symptomatologies/characteristics? And, if you are SO fucking convinced that they ARE, then maybe you could explain why the symptomatologies/characteristics of autism and of mercury poisoning are entirely different!

http://counsellingresource.com/distress/autistic/autism-childhood.html

http://wapedia.mobi/en/Mercury_poisoning#1.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 9:24 AM
Fat Bastard,
The vaccine court isn't even a court. It's just an arm of HHS and was obviously following orders from above in their idiotic decisions.

Denise Vowell decided autistic children who were cured with chelation could have improved by happenstance and that the chelation had no effect. She probably read too many Neuroinsane bligs to reach that inane conclusion. That moronic decision, allegedly based on scientific testimony from some jackass MD, ignores the whole credo of medicine that autism has no cure. It had never been cured before chelation was used and no person who has not been chelated has ever gone from LFA to normal as has been the case since chelation was used. Only a moron could believe one word from this lying jackass. This is a perfect example of a government employee who should be tried by a jury and hung, along with her superiors who told her what to say.

No rational person could reach that conclusion. It is like claiming that anti-venom did not cure the condition of snakebite poisoning and that the victims all recovered via divine intervention. Absurd!

The Bernard paper showed 100 matching symptoms between autism and mercury poisoning. One could do the same study with Alzheimer's and find the same thing, albeit in reverse order as skills diminish rather than never existing.

You're just a disingenuous jackass trying to deny the obvious, as is the case with every Neuroinsane cult member. Again, you have to resort to insults and zero substance and lies to try to make your case. Entirely different symptomology, my ass.

By John Best, at 10:53 AM
Fuck-Ugly Chav-Git-Wizzard: "You're just a disingenuous jackass trying to deny the obvious, as is the case with every Neuroinsane cult member. Again, you have to resort to insults and zero substance and lies to try to make your case. Entirely different symptomology, my ass."

When anyone on this side of the debate presents any credible evidence, all you do yourself is present vacuous claims that the evidence is wrong (as you just did!), and then berate the person presenting it with - guess what - insults. Then when someone puts an insult out to you, you get all arsey about it as if it's a wrong. If you don't want to be insulted, you ugly piece of shit, STOP INSULTING OTHERS.

It's not as if you haven't been pulled up on this before, either: problem with you is that you do indeed put yourself above the rest in terms of having an 'entitlement' to not be insulted whilst retaining the absolute right to insult others. Makes you a piece of shit, that does. NO ifs and no buts.

Get used to this. It's no more and less than you actually deserve, really.

Hypocritical Piece Of Shite: "The Bernard paper showed 100 matching symptoms between autism and mercury poisoning."

Show them. Every fucking one of them. Show them now.

Bet you can't.

Arsewipe: "That moronic decision, allegedly based on scientific testimony from some jackass MD, ignores the whole credo of medicine that autism has no cure."

And you trust someone who has nothing like a medical degree over a medically qualified person? I wouldn't. You're stupid.

I'm going to the shop. I have a nice evening in planned for myself. Your high-maintenance ego doesn't give you much in the way of 'nice evenings in', does it?

Especially combined with your intense need to gamble your dole away.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 12:30 PM
Fat Bastard,
You can go look up the paper that you've already seen if you like. You know they listed the symptoms and you're trying to lie about it by asking stupid questions.

You did not address the fact that cured children are everywhere because there is nothing you can say to deny that fact. One doesn't need to me medically qualified to observe science cure mercury poisoning as I have. The denials have no basis in fact.

You think I gamble my dole away? Think again nitwit. I just had 8 straight days without losing, one break even and 7 wins. I doubt I'll equal my record of 90 straight winning days at two tracks each day but you never know. My winnings have paid for cars, houses, vacations and a high lifestyle over the years. You keep thinking what you want. If you weren't such a jerk, I might give you a few horses to make some easy money for yourself.

By John Best, at 12:52 PM
I could put together a list of 100 matching symptoms between gambling addiction and mercury poisoning, if I wanted to toss around vague generalities while ignoring all of the obvious differences.

Enjoy your evening, David. :)

By abfh, at 1:44 PM
Ugly Twat: "You can go look up the paper that you've already seen if you like. You know they listed the symptoms and you're trying to lie about it by asking stupid questions."

Yeh. Seen that paper. Most of the things they claim are autism symptomatology are separate issues!

Shit-Wizard: "You did not address the fact that cured children are everywhere because there is nothing you can say to deny that fact. One doesn't need to me medically qualified to observe science cure mercury poisoning as I have. The denials have no basis in fact."

Bullshit, you ignorant tosser. It's not whether I can prove they don't exist: you make the claim, you prove the claim! If you can't prove the claim, you can't make the claim stick. What bit of basi logic do you not get, you brain-dead arsehole? You have not demonstrated the cured kids, ergo they do not exist; and they remain non-existent until you produce them. Get used to being wrong.

Arse: "You keep thinking what you want."

Oh, don't worry about that, I shall!

Prepuce: "If you weren't such a jerk, I might give you a few horses to make some easy money for yourself."

Nah. I like to work and earn my money... not easy for foreigners here, but I get to earn some.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 2:05 PM
ABFH: "I could put together a list of 100 matching symptoms between gambling addiction and mercury poisoning, if I wanted to toss around vague generalities while ignoring all of the obvious differences."

Indeed, and it does look like Barnard et al were absolutely desperate to find overlapping sets to the point where they actually added things into the 'autism symptomatology' that obviously don't belong there. Maybe I should be nicer to Prepuce, since he's obviously not able to think very critically... the sad crozzly chav bastard.

ABFH: "Enjoy your evening, David. :)"

Thanks, ABFH... I thoroughly intend to ;)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 2:08 PM
"It's not possible to fuck someone up permanently who is already fucked up with autism."

You damn fool! Of course it's possible!

"I'm 100% certain autism is mercury poisoning."

You're 100% wrong.

"I don't have any ego."

Everyone has an ego. If you don't have an ego, you're brain dead.

You're still off base, John. Right off it. Home plate is the other way.

By Matt Hogan, at 4:32 PM
LoL ... love it, Matt! Excellent put down! :D

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:11 PM
Matt,
How can you possibly make someone worse who is severely fucked up with autism?

Please explain how I am the slightest bit wrong about mercury causing autism? Will you drink some thimerosal to prove your point?

By John Best, at 6:25 PM
Fat Bastard,
How would a nitwit like you know what does and does not belong with autism. I'll bet you've never even met an autistic person you fucking sham.

By John Best, at 6:26 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 8:23 PM
Gnarled Old Chav-Bastard Git-Wizzard: "Fat Bastard,
How would a nitwit like you know what does and does not belong with autism. I'll bet you've never even met an autistic person you fucking sham."

1- I know the criteria, which you obviously do not; I'm familiar with a number of sets of criteria that you haven't even fucking seen (but all of which have been used in clinical practice);

2- I'm trained in the diagnosis of a number of issues in development and education, and a large part of that training was in the recognition and diagnosis of many autistic spectrum states (ICD 10: F84.0 - Kanner syndrome, F84.1 - atypical autism, F84.2 - Rett syndrome, F84.3 - Heller syndrome, F84.4 - overactivity with mental retardation and stereotypical psychomotor difficultes, F84.5 - Asperger syndrome, F84.8 - other 'pervasive developmental disorder' and F84.9 - 'pervasive developmental disorder, unspecified').

As for meeting other autistics, yes I have... certainly numbering in the tens of dozens, actually.

As for being a 'fucking sham': the privilege of that descriptor is yours, and yours alone.

Back to my DVDs. You're not that interesting anymore.

Edit:

For anyone who is new to this blog, the guy trying to give me a hard time is one of the world's most fascistic hater of autistics, a man of such 'intergrity' that he'd have joined in with Mengele in his antics during the days of the Third Reich. He draws fire from many quarters, and it is hostile; but this is for a reason. That reason is this: he basically provokes it. If he doesn't get it, he becomes more obnoxious until he gets a reaction.

Basically, he is the worst type of attention whore you will find. So, in order to satisfy him at the lower level of his psychopathology (postulated to be a very complex personality disorder, as described elsewhere), I - and others - prefer to be slightly hostile towards this person, rather than to spoil ourselves completely.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 9:25 PM
Fat Bastard,
I know the criteria too. The ones who can't talk and smear feces are the most mercury damaged. The assholes who have degrees and are basically nitwits diagnose themselves with Asperger's as an excuse for being a pain in the ass. Everyone in between that is a judgement call to fit some meaningless criteria.

The point you miss, moron, is that all of these brain damaged people might be cured if idiots like you would stick to feeding pellets to rats instead of messing around with science.

By John Best, at 10:49 PM
Attila said;

"What kind of Asshat uses his child's photo as his profile pic?
One who views his child as a possession and not a person, that's who."

So someone isn't allowed to be proud of their kids? Go back to where you came from, wicked witch of the never ever!

"No more life experience. What a shame - NOT!"

And how much do you have again, Glucose? Take a permanent holiday!

By Anonymous, at 2:27 AM
Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard: "Fat Bastard,
I know the criteria too. The ones who can't talk and smear feces are the most mercury damaged."

Evidently you DON'T know the criteria, since shit-smearing is NOT one of them. Not one single set of criteria has ever had that listed as a characteristic of being autistic. You're obviously well off-base on aetiologies as well, since mercury has not been implicated by any reasonable scientific study (by reasonable, I mean any study that has been conducted properly and which has not been a fucking blatant attempt at either scaremongering or sales or just plain clutching at straws and trying to make a fucking lie 'look true'!).

Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard: "The assholes who have degrees and are basically nitwits diagnose themselves with Asperger's as an excuse for being a pain in the ass.

I'd say that some of the people who do self-diagnose may well be off the mark; that doesn't mean that they are necessarily arseholes - they may not be fully aware of the criteria and what they mean. The real arseholes are those who proclaim bullshit as true just after it was demonstrated wrong in court convened for the purpose of looking into calims for vaccine injuries.

Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard: "Everyone in between that is a judgement call to fit some meaningless criteria.

Most things are judgement calls anyway, which is why those of us who trained up to do the diagnosis are the ones who should be doing it, not those who haven't even got an appropriate fucking degree to their names (such as, for example, you!).

Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard: "The point you miss, moron, is that all of these brain damaged people might be cured if idiots like you would stick to feeding pellets to rats instead of messing around with science."

And in his last sentence the Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard demonstrates how fucking little he understands of what psychology really IS about... having demonstrated in just about every post he's made that he's also fucking clueless about what autism is and is not!

Question: should the Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard be subject to a civil commitment, for his own safety and for the safety of others? If so, what treatment options should be considered in his case, and how long should treatment under such a commitment last? Either way, give reasons, citing relevant published material to justify your decision.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 3:44 AM
Fat Nitwit,
It's beyond me why the shitheads who wrote the DSM didn't include feces smearing as a symptom. It just goes to show that pseudosciences like psychology should be outlawed. Talking to your hairdresser probably does more good than psychologists.

Who is some fat, self diagnosed wackjob to decide what's a reasonable study? The reasonable studies were Verstraeten and Bernard by which we gained the information that led to us being able to cure autism. Everything else opposing those two studies is just part of the coverup.

Do you know what psychology is, dumb fuck? Psychology is shysters taking advantage of lonely people who have fallen into the trap of thinking You're OK, I'm not OK from the book "I'm OK, You're OK". All these people need to do is read that book, give themselves a boot in the ass and the jerks like you would all be out of business. And, of course, psychology has no business having anything to do with autism since autism is not some fuzzy thinking they can do anything to ameliorate, it's mercury poisoning and can only be addressed as such.

So you see, nitwit, you've wasted lots of time studying a useless subject. I studied it too a long time ago but, unlike you, I realized at a young age that it was all a crock and I pursued more useful things. It's funny how people with scrambled brains fall for the crap contained within psychology.

By John Best, at 9:48 AM
"You think I gamble my dole away? Think again nitwit. I just had 8 straight days without losing, one break even and 7 wins. I doubt I'll equal my record of 90 straight winning days at two tracks each day but you never know. My winnings have paid for cars, houses, vacations and a high lifestyle over the years. You keep thinking what you want. If you weren't such a jerk, I might give you a few horses to make some easy money for yourself."

Best, you just told me alot about your character in this paragraph. You're spending your money for cars, houses, vacations, and a high lifestyle. What a pathetic clown you are. You should be spending your money to do more important things if anyone else here sees my point.

By Anonymous, at 10:14 AM
The Fuck-Ugly Chavvy Git-Wizzard speaks.... or, at least , shits out of his metaphorical mouth:

"It's beyond me why the shitheads who wrote the DSM didn't include feces smearing as a symptom."

Not to me it isn't. Smearing shit is not a sign of being autistic.

"It just goes to show that pseudosciences like psychology should be outlawed."

LoL - you're just fucking jealous, you crozzled old ugly shit.

"Talking to your hairdresser probably does more good than psychologists."

Depends on the hairdresser and the psychologist. Not that you'd understand, because you're not really clever.

"Who is some fat, self diagnosed wackjob to decide what's a reasonable study?"

Still an illiterate git, eh? Two psychiatrists made formal diagnoses resulting in the same diagnosis. And my training makes me far better at deciding on what a resonable study is than your prejudices and stupidities. Pity you don't understand that... cos you seriously don't.

"The reasonable studies were Verstraeten and Bernard by which we gained the information that led to us being able to cure autism."

You fucking what???? LoL

Those studies are long since discredited, you dopey old chav! LoL

"Everything else opposing those two studies is just part of the coverup."

You paranoid old git!!!! LoL

Now you're getting funny again :D

"Do you know what psychology is, dumb fuck?"

Yes. It is the scientific study of how people think, feel and act as well as the applications of that knowledge in real life issues.

"Psychology is shysters taking advantage of lonely people who have fallen into the trap of thinking You're OK, I'm not OK from the book "I'm OK, You're OK"."

LoL

I'm okay. You're fuckin' not! LoL

"All these people need to do is read that book, give themselves a boot in the ass and the jerks like you would all be out of business."

You wish. Mind you, you couldn't really even dream of cashing in on the pop-psychology market could you, really... I mean ... you can't string a reasonable sentence together. LoL

"And, of course, psychology has no business having anything to do with autism since autism is not some fuzzy thinking they can do anything to ameliorate, it's mercury poisoning and can only be addressed as such."

You have not even come close to proving that .... well, it's not even a hypothesis, is it?

"So you see, nitwit, you've wasted lots of time studying a useless subject."

Nah, chav-bastard. I've not wasted any time... you've been wasting time.

"I studied it too a long time ago but, unlike you, I realized at a young age that it was all a crock and I pursued more useful things."

LoL.... you wish!

You didn't even study. Certainly not psychology!!!!

Really... try a career in stand-up comedy... might make better money than when you gamble your dole away on the geegees!!!! LoL

"It's funny how people with scrambled brains fall for the crap contained within psychology."

Nah - the ones who don't understand psychology properly are the ones that cannot possibly see a use for it. Either because of a fuck-witted prejudice or because of a total lack of the requisite intellectual capacity for thinking at that level. Which one of these is yours, fuckwit?

Oh, and I may indeed be fat (although I've actually lost some weight recently), but - as everyone knows - I can lose weight. You, on the other hand, will always be a fuck-ugly chav!

That comforts me well :)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 10:45 AM
Cube: "Best, you just told me alot about your character in this paragraph. You're spending your money for cars, houses, vacations, and a high lifestyle. What a pathetic clown you are. You should be spending your money to do more important things if anyone else here sees my point."

You mean the impulse-spending and clear inability to save for a rainy day? It's there, isn't it?

:)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 10:46 AM
resonable -> reasonable

typo.

if the fuck-ugly chav-prepuce git-wizzard dares to try and pick me up on that - after having a go at Cube for picking him up on a typo - well... wouldn't that show him for the hypocritical arse that he is? LoL

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 11:28 AM
Sanity Pending,

Not to me it isn't. Smearing shit is not a sign of being autistic.
***It's one of the symptoms so it should be noted but, good effort to wordsmith your way around that. It shows you are dishonest for trying.

LoL - you're just fucking jealous, you crozzled old ugly shit.
***Ad hom, so I win that point.

Depends on the hairdresser and the psychologist. Not that you'd understand, because you're not really clever.
***Whether you think I'm clever is irrelevant, you lose this point too.

Still an illiterate git, eh? Two psychiatrists made formal diagnoses resulting in the same diagnosis. And my training makes me far better at deciding on what a resonable study is than your prejudices and stupidities. Pity you don't understand that... cos you seriously don't.
***Reading a study can be done by anyone. People who can interpret horse races are better at interpreting studies than anyone else on the planet. They know how to find flaws.

You fucking what???? LoL

Those studies are long since discredited, you dopey old chav! LoL
***They were not discredited by anyone who has cured autism and, in fact, have not been discredited at all. That's just a claim made by assholes like you but the claim has no substance to it.

You paranoid old git!!!! LoL

Now you're getting funny again :D
***Insults that don't address the subject so another point deducted for more Ad Hominem.

Yes. It is the scientific study of how people think, feel and act as well as the applications of that knowledge in real life issues.
***Wrong, it is allegeed to be the study of mental cases.

LoL

I'm okay. You're fuckin' not! LoL
***Another point for me since stupid remarks throw no light on the subject.

You wish. Mind you, you couldn't really even dream of cashing in on the pop-psychology market could you, really... I mean ... you can't string a reasonable sentence together. LoL
***Again, failed to address the point and resorted to insults.

You have not even come close to proving that .... well, it's not even a hypothesis, is it?
***Yes, we have proven it. No autism before thimerosal. No autism among ynvaccinated kids in Chocago. Thousands of kids cured by removing mercury proves it.

LoL.... you wish!

You didn't even study. Certainly not psychology!!!!

Really... try a career in stand-up comedy... might make better money than when you gamble your dole away on the geegees!!!! LoL
***Inane remark and ignoring facts.

Nah - the ones who don't understand psychology properly are the ones that cannot possibly see a use for it. Either because of a fuck-witted prejudice or because of a total lack of the requisite intellectual capacity for thinking at that level. Which one of these is yours, fuckwit?
***There are better explanations for all of the garbage psychology tries to sell. Mostly. it involves making excuses for lazy and stupid people. In the case of autism, it is trying to profit with nonsense and getting in the way of children being helped.

Cubed Nitwit,
You need to learn your tenses so you can read properly. I lived a high lifestyle at some point in the past, before marriage and kids.

By John Best, at 12:06 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 12:19 PM
It came in and farted again:

"They were not discredited by anyone who has cured autism and, in fact, have not been discredited at all. That's just a claim made by assholes like you but the claim has no substance to it."

Nobody has cured autism. There has been not one single study that has demonstrated that any human being has been cured of being autistic. Produce ONE study.

"Insults that don't address the subject so another point deducted for more Ad Hominem."

Says the ad hominem king of the world!

"Wrong, it is allegeed to be the study of mental cases."

Oh my fucking Christ! That in itself suggetss that you are totally clueless. Any other psychologist reading this would piss him/herself at how stupid that remark was. I'm right, and you're wrong, and that ain't gonna change very soon, chavvy-arse!

"Another point for me since stupid remarks throw no light on the subject."

Says a fucked-up ugly old chav who does exactly that sort of thing in every post he makes! Sorry... fucked-up ugly old HYPOCRITICAL chav!

"Again, failed to address the point and resorted to insults."

You jealous that someone can play your game better than you?

"Yes, we have proven it. No autism before thimerosal. No autism among ynvaccinated kids in Chocago. Thousands of kids cured by removing mercury proves it."

No, you haven't; and there are NO thousands of kids with removed mercury. They don't exist unless you have provided evidence and you have failed entirely to do that; and you continue to fail, actually.

"Inane remark and ignoring facts."

Just 'doing a Besty' --- LoL

"There are better explanations for all of the garbage psychology tries to sell."

Mercury isn't one of them, not by a long chalk, dipshit.

"Mostly. it involves making excuses for lazy and stupid people."

So, instead of diagnosing you as 'personality disordered', it's okay for us just to call you a 'twat'? Okay ... scratch the diagnosis: Besty's just a twat.

Either way, it's incurable.

"In the case of autism, it is trying to profit with nonsense and getting in the way of children being helped."

LoL

Total fucking bollocks.

Again... my earlier question: should the Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard be subject to a civil commitment, for his own safety and for the safety of others? If so, what treatment options should be considered in his case, and how long should treatment under such a commitment last? Either way, give reasons, citing relevant published material to justify your decision.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 12:29 PM
"You think I gamble my dole away? Think again nitwit. I just had 8 straight days without losing, one break even and 7 wins. I doubt I'll equal my record of 90 straight winning days at two tracks each day but you never know. My winnings have paid for cars, houses, vacations and a high lifestyle over the years. You keep thinking what you want. If you weren't such a jerk, I might give you a few horses to make some easy money for yourself."

"Cubed Nitwit,
You need to learn your tenses so you can read properly. I lived a high lifestyle at some point in the past, before marriage and kids."

Actually, I did read it properly. You said that you paid for cars, houses, vacations, and a high lifestyle over the years. The truth is this sentence is vague. It does not tell me how many years in the past this is. For all I know this could be 2 years ago, 5 years ago or 20 years ago.

When you add this sentence "I just had 8 straight days without losing, one break even and 7 wins. I doubt I'll equal my record of 90 straight winning days at two tracks each day but you never know" this also gave me a clue that it was the recent past and not a long time ago.

The way that I interpreted your whole commentary was that it was your recent past and not your distant past.

I know what you're doing Best. You're trying to manipulate the language. I am not fooled by this Best. I've been studying your tactics for a long time and they're straight from the Joesph Gobbels and sun tzu's playbooks.

Another tactic you use is to get people angry enough to post their full name and address so you can post it on your pathetic excuse for a blog. Your tactics will not work on me Best.

As I said my challenge to you still stands.

By Anonymous, at 1:08 PM
Cube: "Actually, I did read it properly. You said that you paid for cars, houses, vacations, and a high lifestyle over the years. The truth is this sentence is vague. It does not tell me how many years in the past this is. For all I know this could be 2 years ago, 5 years ago or 20 years ago."

It could also - if his claims that he is winning most of the time - be going on now. Unless he's lying.

"When you add this sentence 'I just had 8 straight days without losing, one break even and 7 wins. I doubt I'll equal my record of 90 straight winning days at two tracks each day but you never know' this also gave me a clue that it was the recent past and not a long time ago."

The 'just had' bit firmly locates the events in question in the very recent past.

"The way that I interpreted your whole commentary was that it was your recent past and not your distant past."

Exactly!

"I know what you're doing Best. You're trying to manipulate the language. I am not fooled by this Best. I've been studying your tactics for a long time and they're straight from the Joesph Gobbels and sun tzu's playbooks."

He's sad enough to think that he can do this. How pathetic is that guy?

"Another tactic you use is to get people angry enough to post their full name and address so you can post it on your pathetic excuse for a blog. Your tactics will not work on me Best."

This is true. He actively goads. I'm surprised he's not landed himself in either hospital or in jail with that kind of tactic for pissing people off.

"As I said my challenge to you still stands."

He'll never rise to it because he knows he cannot provide the evidence the challenge needs. Simple as that.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 1:20 PM
Fat Moron,
We don't need studies after we cure our kids to show that they are normal. This is the dumbest argument I have ever heard from the dumbest fucks on the planet, Neuroinsanity. Why would any parent lie about curing autism, you ignorant fuck?

By John Best, at 1:41 PM
Why does this guy never keep his bloody arsehole SHUT?!:

"We don't need studies after we cure our kids to show that they are normal."

If you want to PROVE that you've cured them, with a cure that can be used by anyone, then ... yes, you fucking do, you pot knob!

"This is the dumbest argument I have ever heard from the dumbest fucks on the planet, Neuroinsanity."

No, it isn't, you ugly twat. You must have read your own 'arguments' out loud before you post them... even if only to make sure that what you typed was fuckin' English!

"Why would any parent lie about curing autism, you ignorant fuck?"

To brow-beat pharmaceutical companies into funding their gambling habits? Eh, what about that notion, you ugly chav bastard?

You're too easy, Man. All you are is just a very slack ring-piece flapping about in some poor flatulent's bloody wind. You make fuck all sense. No wonder we all take the piss out of you!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 1:49 PM
Mr. Andrews, with my math proof I am working on, once I am done I will show you it.

As I said, I am going through major personal problems right now so I am having major difficulties doing anything more and more everyday. Phil knows about my major issues.

I will not discuss my issues here because, and I paraphrase Alyric "Best is Scum." He would use my major difficulties against me just like he has done with you Mr. Andrews, Phil, Kassiane, and others.

I would not put it past him that if he obtained my personal information he would harass my loved ones to get to me.

One of Sun Tzu's quotes is "First, Know yourself, and then know your enemy."

Another of Sun Tzu's quotes is "It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle."

You see Best, you may win minor victory points here and there but you do not know me or hardly anything about me. I can play by your military strategy too Best.

Best, I know a lot about myself. I know my own strengths and weaknesses, Best. In addition, I know more about you than you do yourself.

You've revealed a lot of information about yourself which is a moronic thing to do.

Here is some of the information you revealed about yourself to me.

Directly
1. Your name

2. Your Place of residence

3. You have 3 children and you have a wife.

4. You've revealed you've helped the black panthers

5. You've also revealed you were in the military. You were discharged for whatever reason whether it was honorable or dishonorable.

Indirectly
1. You are a gambler. This means you love to take risks.

2. You have a huge ego.

3. You have a huge sense of entitlement

4. You are a bigoted man.

5. One person who has defended you online said that this person knows you and said in real life you were a nice guy. You're putting on a superfical charm is what you're doing.

6. You are very hubristic.

7. When someone stands up to you you are a coward and turn tail and run.

In essence, all of these traits make you a very funny man who should be laughed at and scoffed at.

Are you going to accept my challege Best?

By Anonymous, at 2:10 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 2:54 PM
Cube: "Mr. Andrews, with my math proof I am working on, once I am done I will show you it."

Looking forward to it :)

Cube: "As I said, I am going through major personal problems right now so I am having major difficulties doing anything more and more everyday. Phil knows about my major issues."

WRT these difficulties... best thing to do is, indeed, not to say anything here...

Cube: "I will not discuss my issues here because, and I paraphrase Alyric 'Best is Scum'."

I have a feeling that Alyric wouldn't might being quoted direct on what Best is.

Cube: "He would use my major difficulties against me just like he has done with you Mr. Andrews, Phil, Kassiane, and others."

Which suggests a predatory and parasitic aspect to his personality structure.

Cube: "I would not put it past him that if he obtained my personal information he would harass my loved ones to get to me."

Actually... he's done that already. Not with me, but with others.

Cube: "One of Sun Tzu's quotes is "First, Know yourself, and then know your enemy."

Absolutely.

Cube: "Another of Sun Tzu's quotes is 'It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle'."

That's about right.

Cube: "You see Best, you may win minor victory points here and there but you do not know me or hardly anything about me. I can play by your military strategy too Best."

I wouldn't credit him with too much prowess, Cube... there's a reason why he has been out of the service for quite a long time, and I have a feeling it's not ... something he'd want people knowing :P

Cube: "Best, I know a lot about myself. I know my own strengths and weaknesses, Best. In addition, I know more about you than you do yourself."

If we're talking about his unconscious slips... you probably do!

Cube: "You've revealed a lot of information about yourself which is a moronic thing to do."

:)

Cube: "Here is some of the information you revealed about yourself to me."

This is gonna be fun :D

Directly
Cube: "1. Your name."

John Frederick Best

Cube: "2. Your Place of residence."

Londonderry. New Hampshire - had the address but it's lost in my packing from my house move...

Cube: "3. You have 3 children and you have a wife."

So he says...

Cube: "4. You've revealed you've helped the black panthers."

From what I heard, by trying to turn one of them white with some fucked-up cream/lotion 'remedy', the like of which he STILL obsesses on today! LoL

Cube: "5. You've also revealed you were in the military. You were discharged for whatever reason whether it was honorable or dishonorable."

I'm going with the second.

Indirectly
Cube: "1. You are a gambler. This means you love to take risks."

True. He does.

Cube: "2. You have a huge ego."

True. He does.

Cube: "3. You have a huge sense of entitlement."

Fucking HUGE sense of it... pathologically huge!

Cube: "4. You are a bigoted man."

To what index would you wish to raise the 'bigoted' in order to approach a reasonably accurate quantification? ;)

Cube: "5. One person who has defended you online said that this person knows you and said in real life you were a nice guy. You're putting on a superfical charm is what you're doing."

Impression management. I heard that he's just as much a twat in his everyday life.

Cube: "6. You are very hubristic."

Hyooooooooooobreeeeeeee!!!! Shitloads of it.

Cube: "7. When someone stands up to you you are a coward and turn tail and run."

I've seen the ugly bastard do that a lot of late.

Cube: "In essence, all of these traits make you a very funny man who should be laughed at and scoffed at."

I did suggest stand-up... a much more certain income than gambling... but nah... he won't listen to good advice!

Cube: "Are you going to accept my challenge Best?"

LoL - we wait with bated breath!

I think he's chickened out already. Seriously.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 2:56 PM
"Good to hear about the bachelor's degree :) And I'd say you earned it well, too! I've seen some of the more obvious orthography-oriented issues you have to deal with in your posts on here, and I'm aware of how that can make one feel; unlike some, though, I go beyond that and will only ask for clarification if I really need it. Never had to yet with you :)"

Thanks! This is why I had major problems with geometric proofs in 10th and word problems too.

With geometric proofs, I had major orthography-oriented problems with geometric proofs. They would give me the theorems and the symbols but they would not give me the rules on how to apply and use the theorems and how to use the symbols.

With word problems the language dialect for me was vague almost like Best's language dialect. In fact, this is the language dialect that is spoken here.

The dialect has words and phrases which can have multiple meanings. In effect, I have communication difficulties because of this. In addition in real life I can offend people but never know why.

For the first time in my entire life I have met people, including Phil, you, ABFH, and Alyric, who are clear and non-ambiguous in the way that they speak to me.

For example, if I broke one of ABFH or Alyric's rules on their respective websites they would quickly tell me, show me how I broke said rules, and why those said rules are in place. They would tell me the logic behind the rules. If I offended you or Phil in anyway both of you would be quick to point that out, tell me how I offended, and what I can do to rectify the situation.

Once I understand the rules and logic about anything than I am fine. With Best and NTs they can be very ambigious.

"From what I heard, by trying to turn one of them white with some fucked-up cream/lotion 'remedy', the like of which he STILL obsesses on today! LoL"

I thought this was a satire. I did not think this was real. If this was real this would be his nail in the coffin.

Bobby Seale is living today. I wonder what Bobby Seale would say about Best and Best's activities with the Black Panthers.

By Anonymous, at 4:08 PM
Fat Nitwit,
I don't need a DBCS to cure a slice or to cure autism. All I have to do is give the instructions. If the cure works, the proof is in the golf ball going straight or the child acting normally.

You neuroinsane nitwits are realy looking foolish trying to claim a cured kid is not proof in himself and that that proof has to be shown to some self appointed authority. Parents who give a damn about their kids, unlike you goofballs, just go ahead and help them...no authorities needed. Do you know how stupid you sound asking for studies to show proof?

Cubed Idiot,
What is this damn challemge you have been ranting about? Spell it out of me because I don't know what it is.

By John Best, at 4:09 PM
"Matt,
How can you possibly make someone worse who is severely fucked up with autism?"

John,
By killing them. Or by making them exactly like you.

"Please explain how I am the slightest bit wrong about mercury causing autism?"

Take your pick! If mercury causes autism there would be a lot more feces smearing going on!

"Will you drink some thimerosal to prove your point?"

Sure! Put a milligram of it into a shot of beer.

And you're gambling with more than money. You're gambling with your son's life!

By Matt Hogan, at 4:16 PM
David,
John's address will be on the Whitepages.com site.

By Matt Hogan, at 4:18 PM
"What is this damn challemge you have been ranting about? Spell it out of me because I don't know what it is."

John you do realize you just displayed an Autistic trait with that query?

By Matt Hogan, at 4:25 PM
Some ignorant fucker farted:

"I don't need a DBCS to cure a slice or to cure autism."

To actually prove that it is what you think it is that diod the job, you need a study, and it has to control for all possible variables that could confound the study. The people in the study need to be ignorant of whether they are getting an active treatment or a placebo treatment. And the people doing the actual treatment and observation activities need to be ignorant of who gets what, too. That is how we control against any subjectivity-based confounds in the study. If you can't understand WHY those safeguards are needed, then you're an utter fucking brainless idiot.

"All I have to do is give the instructions."

To prove that the instructions you give are the ones doing the job, you have to have a control condition to compare the results to. Again, if you can't understand why, then you're brainless, and need serious assistance.

"If the cure works, the proof is in the golf ball going straight or the child acting normally."

Is it fuck as like!!!! The proof is in the determination of what it was that brought about the change! And unless you have a DBCS, you can't know, and therefore you can't prove. Again, if this is beyond you evidently very limited understanding, you need some serious treatment. May I recommend cyanide?

"You neuroinsane nitwits are realy looking foolish trying to claim a cured kid is not proof in himself and that that proof has to be shown to some self appointed authority."

Says a guy who has appointed himself an authority on something he evidently knows less than fuck all about!

"Parents who give a damn about their kids, unlike you goofballs, just go ahead and help them...no authorities needed."

I would (and DO) want to know - when someone says 'this will help your child' - HOW it will help her,
WHAT Paret of the intervention it is that will help her, and I fully expect there to be at least one DBC study - REPLICABLE - to demonstrate efficacy.

And any parent that was NOT willing to ask for those is actually asking for trouble.

"Do you know how stupid you sound asking for studies to show proof?"

Says a guy who's been DEMANDING from autistic people PROOF of their diagnoses! Actually, it's not stupid to ask for studies to show a proof of something... or, at least, a properly controlled demonstration that the thing you THINK is working is actually the thing that IS working. Again... if you can't understand why that is important, there's no fucking hope for you, and not a lot for Sam, either. Sadly.

"Cubed Idiot,
What is this damn challemge you have been ranting about? Spell it out of me because I don't know what it is."

He spelt it out a few posts back, and you responded at the time with some docile remark, so you DO know what the challenge is. Your problem is that you know you cannot prove a fucking thing.

Now - the choices are clear:

1- accept the challenge, and prove you've been curing your son; or,

2- SHUT THE FUCK UP! You're getting monotonous.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:30 PM
Cube: "For the first time in my entire life I have met people, including Phil, you, ABFH, and Alyric, who are clear and non-ambiguous in the way that they speak to me."

Well, speaking for myself (but feeling confident that the others will agree), it's a pleasure and privilege to be able to communicate with you... as people who perhaps need less ambiguity than most people seem to cope with. I for one feel that it is very important to communicate clearly. As for any communication with the Fuck-Ugly Chavvy-Twat Git-Wizzard, sadly it matters not if we are clear or not when trying to communicate with him ... simply because he ignores what we say and then obsesses on his own little theme.

Cube: "I thought this was a satire. I did not think this was real. If this was real this would be his nail in the coffin."

Odd as it may sound, I'm not sure it IS satire... something I saw somewhere that told the story of trying to make a black guy white, and an arrest for assault. I dunno how apocryphal it is, but it seems that there was something. Further info would be needed to confirm or disconfirm the idea.

Cube: "Bobby Seale is living today. I wonder what Bobby Seale would say about Best and Best's activities with the Black Panthers."

Maybe we should ask him! :)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:37 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:40 PM
Well...

Almost zero seconds later, three records came up; it took zero seconds to find his! There seemed to be at least five more records besides the original three.

Two seconds into the search, I had eliminated the two wrong results; and that would seem to be enough fo(u)r one day!

I bet he'd have said that I'd be too thick to find ZIP on there!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:49 PM
Please don't post home addresses on my blog for purposes of harassment.

By abfh, at 4:50 PM
no home address, for sure, ABFH.

shall i remove my immediately previous post? just so i know...

(i don't know how specific ZIP codes are in the US... ours in finland aren't very specific).

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 4:55 PM
A five-digit ZIP code identifies the general area, and a nine-digit ZIP code identifies a specific property.

I see that you've deleted the post with the ZIP... thanks. You don't need to remove the post about how long the search took.

By abfh, at 5:06 PM
"WHAT Paret of the intervention"->"WHAT part of the intervention"

typo

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:09 PM
ABFH: "I see that you've deleted the post with the ZIP... thanks. You don't need to remove the post about how long the search took."

Yeh. Especially since it identifies the property itself. I'll leave the search description there, then :)

In the UK, the post-code identifies about half a dozen properties. The Finnish one (five digits) identifies a much wider area.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:11 PM
"Well, speaking for myself (but feeling confident that the others will agree), it's a pleasure and privilege to be able to communicate with you... as people who perhaps need less ambiguity than most people seem to cope with. I for one feel that it is very important to communicate clearly. As for any communication with the Fuck-Ugly Chavvy-Twat Git-Wizzard, sadly it matters not if we are clear or not when trying to communicate with him ... simply because he ignores what we say and then obsesses on his own little theme."

I had the same pleasure as well.

I posted the challenge to Best 2-3 times.

Best the Hubristic One: Are you having Selective Amnesia Best? It's a comment on the post about Paul Ofitt. I'm not going to let you forget this Best.

http://www.bobbyseale.com/

Here is the website he can be reached at.

By Anonymous, at 5:23 PM
Fat Bastard,
We do not need to control for anything with autism. These kids are so mentally fucked up that they don't have the slightest clue what a placebo is. They're lucky if they can tell the difference between eating feces or chocolate.

Here's your study, bonehead. There are thousands of adults with autism in asylums who don't even know what their names are. They have not been chelated. Kids who have been chelated and then learn to respond to their names, write them and say them have improved because of the chelation. They are the first autistics since Eli Lilly invented autism to ever improve in this fashion.

That means, dumb fuck, that the improvement was not due to time, or the same stupid teaching methods that have been used all these years and produced nothing.

Instead of wasting millions of $$$ on a dumb study, just open your eyes and use your fucking brain.

All of the sane parents who try to help their kids instead of letting them rot like you just take the info from parents who have already cured their kids and do the same. It's like the person who invented bandaids. Nobody asked for a study, they just began using them. What a fucking moron you are. Did you have to go to college to become this dense or did you never have any common sense.

By John Best, at 5:25 PM
Some fucking dopey sod needs something to calm his stinky arse down!!!!!! This one:

"Fat Bastard,"

One of my favourite Mike Myers characters!

"We do not need to control for anything with autism."

Yes, we do!!!!

"These kids are so mentally fucked up that they don't have the slightest clue what a placebo is."

The people working with them would know one, which is why DOUBLE-BLIND! Shitting Jesus... how could you not get THAT?

"They're lucky if they can tell the difference between eating feces or chocolate."

That's how you see your son?

"Here's your study, bonehead. There are thousands of adults with autism in asylums who don't even know what their names are. They have not been chelated. Kids who have been chelated and then learn to respond to their names, write them and say them have improved because of the chelation. They are the first autistics since Eli Lilly invented autism to ever improve in this fashion."

LoL .... wrong, because there's fuck all evidence that what you say worked actually DID work.

"That means, dumb fuck, that the improvement was not due to time, or the same stupid teaching methods that have been used all these years and produced nothing."

It means nothing because you can't demonstrate what - if anything - did the job you're claiming it to have done.

"Instead of wasting millions of $$$ on a dumb study, just open your eyes and use your fucking brain."

That's not enough to stop the confounds. Why you can't get this I really do not know, unless you are really that fucking stupid!

"All of the sane parents who try to help their kids instead of letting them rot like you just take the info from parents who have already cured their kids and do the same."

Straw man. Useless. Grow up, you pillock. You're really looking stupid now!

"It's like the person who invented bandaids. Nobody asked for a study, they just began using them."

Facile response, bordering on the brain-dead!

"What a fucking moron you are."

Project much, shit-pig?

"Did you have to go to college to become this dense or did you never have any common sense."

If you're asking a question, use a fucking question mark!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:39 PM
"Instead of wasting millions of $$$ on a dumb study, just open your eyes and use your fucking brain.

All of the sane parents who try to help their kids instead of letting them rot like you just take the info from parents who have already cured their kids and do the same. It's like the person who invented bandaids. Nobody asked for a study, they just began using them. What a fucking moron you are. Did you have to go to college to become this dense or did you never have any common sense."

How do these so called sane parents that their chelating is doing anything at all? For all we know, the children may be improving despite the chelation. It could be that they're just learning more and more life enchancing skills on their own.

This is my entire problem with the phrase common sense. In fact, here is the definition right here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_sense

Here is a quote from it:
"Common sense (or, when used attributively as an adjective, commonsense, common-sense, or commonsensical), based on a strict construction of the term, consists of what people in common would agree on: that which they "sense" (in common) as their common natural understanding. Some people (such as the authors of Merriam-Webster Online) use the phrase to refer to beliefs or propositions that — in their opinion — most people would consider prudent and of sound judgment, without reliance on esoteric knowledge or study or research, but based upon what they see as knowledge held by people "in common". Thus "common sense" (in this view) equates to the knowledge and experience which most people allegedly have, or which the person using the term believes that they do or should have."

This is my problem with the concept of "common sense". In human history, things that have been held as common sense beliefs have been proven wrong.

There was a time when it was common sense belief the earth was flat and not a sphere.

Best, the five senses can be fooled and that has been proven time and time again.

The truth is common sense can become ambigious, vague, and can be wrong.

In my opinion Hasty Generalizations can be formed from common sense. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization - This is the meaning of Hasty generalization. You do this all the time Best. In fact, people with so called common-sense make hasty generalizations all of the fucking time.

By Anonymous, at 5:50 PM
Cube... brilliant post!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:52 PM
Fat Moron,
This is not about satisfying any jackass scientists who caused this fucking epidemic. It's about helping the victims, now, before it's too late for them.

I don't give a fuck about what any alleged scientists say or what fucking standards they claim to have. They screwed up by not doing any studies before they poisoned these kids so the hell with them. We don't need them, you or any other idiot giving us any crap about how we give these kids their lives back. Don't you understand that, simpleton?

The evidence of everywhere, shit for brains. You're just too stupid to accept the fact that every word you say is wrong when it comes to autism. You need to learn from the intellectuals like me who have cured this nightmare misnamed autism.

BTW, I just cashed a ticket on a horse named Golf Pal who paid $33.80 in the last race at Gulfstream. If you had some fucking manners, I might have given it to you.

By John Best, at 5:53 PM
The man farts pure comedy!!!!! Look:

"Fat Moron,

LoL --- vacuous attempt to insult. No points for that!

"This is not about satisfying any jackass scientists who caused this fucking epidemic."

What fucking epidemic???? LoL

There is no fucking epidemic!!!

"It's about helping the victims, now, before it's too late for them."

Don't be so fucking alarmist and so bleeding stupid! Holy fucking bollocks! You really have lost the fucking plot!!!!!

"I don't give a fuck about what any alleged scientists say or what fucking standards they claim to have."

I couldn't gave a dead rat's fucking crozzled-up bollock what you do or don't give a fuck about, you idiot! HAVEN'T YOU SUSSED THAT OUT YET????

"They screwed up by not doing any studies before they poisoned these kids so the hell with them."

You're trying to use an at best unproven (and at worst disproven) premise. Stupid man!

"We don't need them, you or any other idiot giving us any crap about how we give these kids their lives back."

Wrong, for reasons ALREADY stated!!!

"Don't you understand that, simpleton?"

Project much, eh?

"The evidence of everywhere, shit for brains."

No it isn't if it's not properly collected, compiled, analysed and accounted for! How can you be this thick with just one fucking head?

"You're just too stupid to accept the fact that every word you say is wrong when it comes to autism."

Want me to believe that? Okay ... go on... fucking PROVE IT!

That, else shut the fuck up!

"You need to learn from the intellectuals like me who have cured this nightmare misnamed autism."

Good job I went to the toilet earlier or I really would have pissed my fucking hole off laughing there!!!!

You? Fucking intellectual?? You're a Roman Catholic, yeh? If you are an intellectual, I am your bloody Pope!

I'm not the Pope - and you're no fucking intellectual!

"BTW, I just cashed a ticket on a horse named Golf Pal who paid $33.80 in the last race at Gulfstream. If you had some fucking manners, I might have given it to you."

If that's a race in the US; what the fuck good is it to me? I live in Finland - as if you couldn't suss THAT one out! As for manners, you're no authority to lecture me on manners.

Really... you'd rake it in as a stand-up - well, 'bend-down' more like... comic!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:06 PM
Hey Best

You're latest post proves that you have a really high ego. You're becoming very angry that you're being proven wrong.

This is called pride and your pride has blinded you to reason. This is in the bible too. http://scripturetext.com/proverbs/11-2.htm

You are full of hubris and pride Best by your very own biblical standards.

By Anonymous, at 6:23 PM
Shit!

Chicken bastard's fucked off!!!

Ma Pal sed: "You're latest post proves that you have a really high ego. You're becoming very angry that you're being proven wrong."

Indeed, Cube... I could see him getting nastier and nastier the angrier he got. I've italicised part of your rejoinder to him for a reason.

You see, you hit the nail right on the fucking head, Cube!!! That pillock's never had anyone tell him that he's been wrong before and stick to it. They've probably always caved in before, just to avoid his fucking pathological abuse! I know from elsewhere that he likes to quote Freud, and this is no surprise: Freud was a spoilt bastard, too! Spoilt, in fact, to the point where - even in his clinical practice - he couldn't bear to be corrected by anyone.

Best's exactly the fucking same!!! Tell him he's wrong, he goes fucking postal! He cannot handle it... even JB Handjob can't handle Best when he's got a bloody strop on... Best's basically a totally fucked up individual and there's fuck all hope for a reversal of years of damage that he's brought on himself by being a spoilt fucker!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:01 PM
Nitwits R Us,
It doesn't matter how many times you twerps tell me I'm wrong. My sons already proved I'm right and they're the only ones who matter. Psychologists shouldn't act like mental cases in public, Andrews.

By John Best, at 7:14 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:19 PM
"It doesn't matter how many times you twerps tell me I'm wrong. My sons already proved I'm right and they're the only ones who matter. Psychologists shouldn't act like mental cases in public, Andrews."

Best you can do, Best?

They haven't proved a bloody thing and that is what YOU know as well as everybody else. And that's what pisses you off.

Deal with being wrong and start being a good dad to those lads.

You got owned.

Learn from it.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:22 PM
"I don't give a fuck about what any alleged scientists say or what fucking standards they claim to have. They screwed up by not doing any studies before they poisoned these kids so the hell with them. We don't need them, you or any other idiot giving us any crap about how we give these kids their lives back. Don't you understand that, simpleton?"

Right. That piece of hysteria shows how irrational you are. Science has made great leaps forward. No wonder you don't know where home plate is and you're going the wrong damn way! And no damn wonder your thinking comes from fucking 1700!! Check your calendar again.

"The evidence of everywhere, shit for brains."

"My sons already proved I'm right and they're the only ones who matter."

SHOW US!!!!!! PROVE IT!!!!!!!

One person does not prove you right. Let's see the back up also.

Are you a man or a mouse?

By Matt Hogan, at 7:23 PM
Mr. Andrews

Do you notice he's not responding to me anymore?

By Anonymous, at 7:24 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:33 PM
Matt: "Right. That piece of hysteria shows how irrational you are."

Indeed it does, Matt. He's very irrational.

Matt: "SHOW US!!!!!! PROVE IT!!!!!!!"

He won't. Because he can't.

Matt: "One person does not prove you right. Let's see the back up also."

Exactly. But - he has nothing to back his argument up.

Matt: "Are you a man or a mouse?"

Intellectually... he's the second.

"Mr. Andrews"

Yes, Cube?

"Do you notice he's not responding to me anymore?"

I do. That has not escaped my notice... this is a strange moment.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:34 PM
If he can't prove it then he should shut up.

By Matt Hogan, at 7:40 PM
Matt: "If he can't prove it then he should shut up."

I agree, and I've been telling him all the time.

As to whether he will, I can't say... he's not a rational man by any stretch of the imagination.

But I agree... basically, he should prove it in the expected manner, or shut the fuck up, and piss off.

I suspect he'll do neither.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:42 PM
Cube... going back to your fact-find on 'common sense'... your 'flat-earth-round-earth' thing is just one case in point, where common sense is full of confounds.

Another is Aristotle's notion that the natural state of motion for any body of a given mass is rest (i. e., 0 m/s). The work of Newton (and to quite an extent that of Galileo too) went towards showing that - whilst Aristotle's notion wasn't completely wrong - it wasn't anywhere near completely right, either: it was, in fact, just a specific case in a whole infinite set of possible rest states.

And it was only when we moved away from the 'common sense' way of learning about the world and moved to a more considered and structured approach to finding things out (and trying to account for confounds) that we started to move forward in our understanding of the world around us.

Common sense isn't enough when trying to find out 'what works', 'why it works (or doesn't)', and 'how it works (or doesn't)' ...

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 8:14 PM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 8:49 PM
Looks like the imbecile fucked off.

I'm gonna go to bed. Thank you for your inputs, Cube and Matt; and you, ABFH, for your refereeing earlier.

G'night all!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 9:04 PM
Nitwits,
You dopes love to use the flat earth analogy but you don't see that you are the idiots it applies to. You still claim autism can't be cured and we've been doing it for 8 years now. When are you going to update your knowledge?

Cubed,
Go look up the movie "Autism Yesterday".

By John Best, at 9:17 PM
When you provide scientifically backed up PROOF! No one believed the earth was round until it was proven.

By Matt Hogan, at 10:14 PM
Matt,
Anyone who cures autism is a scientist, certainly a better scientist than those who won't or can't cure it. So, just ask any mother or father who has cured their child and you will have your scientific proof.

BTW, did you note that I cured one of my son's? That makes me a scientist.

By John Best, at 10:29 PM
John, just trying to help out but it might be better if you didn't claim to be a scientist. You'll get laughed at by those who you need to convince you are right.

I get that no one believes you. People sometimes refuse to change with the times. Just say that you are a parent who has two sons who are Autistic and what you've done to help them and answer all the questions no matter how stupid they are.

Especially if they come from Glucose!

By Anonymous, at 12:51 AM
Holy fucking bollocks! The idiot can't help it, can he? Watch:

"You dopes love to use the flat earth analogy but you don't see that you are the idiots it applies to."

That the best you can come up with? I mean, really?!

"You still claim autism can't be cured and we've been doing it for 8 years now."

No, you haven't. There's been no evidence because there's been no study. Without the properly controlled study, there's no way of demonstrating that you have cured anything. I can't believe that one guy with only one head can be this stupid... it's official: JBJr has indeed been owned! What a fucking idiot.

"When are you going to update your knowledge?"

When you come up with a study that accounts for all possible confounds - basically, a DBCS . Until then, you're making a claim that you know you cannot substantiate. And making a claim you know you can't substantiate is called what, children?

Yes, boys and girls... it's called LYING!

No wonder JBJr has to lie about having three degrees. And still... lying about those doesn't make them exist, either!

Matt: "When you provide scientifically backed up PROOF! No one believed the earth was round until it was proven."

John Best Jr cannot prove anything; he has not managed to do his study and that's an end to it. He hasn't proved anything and he's not going to. He thinks that just making the claim is science... oh boy, I feel sorry for his kids... the picture of the world that he must be giving them!!! Laughable....

Someone who keeps talking when he should be listening said:

"Anyone who cures autism is a scientist, certainly a better scientist than those who won't or can't cure it."

Too many holes in that one to list!

"So, just ask any mother or father who has cured their child and you will have your scientific proof."

Wrong... so fucking wrong. For reasons already stated...

"BTW, did you note that I cured one of my son's? That makes me a scientist."

You didn't cure anybody, John. And you especially haven't cured yourself of that inborn stupidity you keep displaying. If I were your kid, and I read this, I'd die of extreme embarrassment!

Fuck-Ugly Chavvy-Twat Git-Wizzard's bum-chum said:

"John, just trying to help out but it might be better if you didn't claim to be a scientist. You'll get laughed at by those who you need to convince you are right."

And s/he was right. Sadly, for all the wrong reasons. But, nevetheless, Informer is right. Best not to claim one is a scientist when one clearly isn't... it WILL get you laughed at. Those of us who studied the sciences, got our degrees in the sciences and understand AND USE the scientific method are scientists. The Fuck-Ugly Chavvy-Twat GitWizzard is no scientist.

He is, though, an imbecile. And that is never going to change. He's too stupid to make it change.

So, back to my question: should the the Fuck-Ugly Chavvy-Twat Git-Wizzard be subject to a civil commitment, for his own safety and for the safety of others? If so, what treatment options should be considered in his case, and how long should treatment under such a commitment last? Either way, give reasons, citing relevant published material to justify your decision.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 1:23 AM
Mr. Andrews, Best wrote about you on his blog if you want to take a look.

By Anonymous, at 1:37 AM
Informer,
The funny thing here is Andrews claiming to have a degree in science. Sure, the science of giving pellets to rats and listening to bored housewives spin their tales of woe. At least I do something useful with what I learned from studying psychology, I use statistics to analyze races. He tries to use stat's to prevent people from curing autism. What an asshole!

These twerps know I'm right. It's part of their job in spreading propaganda to deny it though so, I could have PhDs in every scientific discipline and they'd still argue with me if I send 100 cured kids to beat them senseless so they could see the proof.

This isn't about arguing science, it's about denying the truth that all of these assholes know the same as I do. Thimerosal caused the epidemic and chelation cures it. All you have to do is try it on any autistic person and watch them turn human again or, in Andrews' case, improve from nitwit to moron.

By John Best, at 1:41 AM
Cube: "Mr. Andrews, Best wrote about you on his blog if you want to take a look."

Why am I not surprised?

He can't stand being wrong.

And you're right about the abuse of truth and propaganda things.

Maybe I should do one the same on my blog. Been looking for a good reason and now I have one.

So... my turn to make 'facts' up about JBJr.

And there's fuck all he can do about it (best is, I don't have to stretch the truth about him).

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 1:51 AM
John, I don't think you're right when you say, "these twerps know I'm right". They don't and that's the whole problem. Sending 100 cured kids to beat them up won't do it. Send those kids to fully qualified psychologists and get a diagnosis of "Not on the Autistic Spectrum" in full and then the naysayers can't argue.

Statistics can prove anything a person wants to. No one can win that sort of fight. You certainly can't win it if you keep referring back to the horses. What you need is statistics of another sort. How about an update on Autism prevalence? What about the flu vaccines? There's plenty to debate.

By Anonymous, at 6:05 AM
Informer,
Dr Rimland had 100 cured kids onstage about 5 years ago and these idiots keep making fun of the children and claiming they don't look cured. These people will lie about anything to promote their deranged agenda.

I would think the neuroinsane would like horse analogies since they're all horse's asses.

By John Best, at 7:49 AM
Mr. Andrews, I have my proof kind of ready if you want to see it.

By Anonymous, at 11:44 AM
Cube, that would be rather cool :)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 12:19 PM
Mr. Andrews, Where do you want me to send it to?

By Anonymous, at 12:25 PM
good question, Cube...

late me get back to u on that ....

too many lying twats lurking around here

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 1:07 PM
Mr Andrews, do you have an email address?

By Anonymous, at 2:39 PM
i do, but giving it here would be committing an act of email suicide, really - the resident psychopath would behave as gentlemanly as ever (like, NOT!) if I gave that out.

Clay knows it, if you know Clay's email.....

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 2:47 PM
Mr. Andrews

I just created a temp email address you can send it too.

I won't use it after I send my thing and you respond.

It's aspie6073@yahoo.com. They can spam all they like. It will do them no good because I will never use it again most likely.

By Anonymous, at 3:38 PM
Rimland, John? He doesn't know anything about it. Never did. The man couldn't walk a crooked line!

By Matt Hogan, at 4:06 PM
Wasn't Rimland the guy that - along with that fucking Nazi Bastard Løvås (that's Lovaas' name in Norwegian!) - advocated giving autistic kids LSD to 'make them normal'?

(yes - it was, and I know this because one of the first books I read on autism was Rimland's!)

If that lying piece of shit Best wants to have a go at Amanda Baggs for the LSD thing: here's some fucking news.... she was only doing what RIMLAND and LOVAAS had actually fucking TRIED, not just advocated.

And we all know that Besty wishes he'd been sucking Rimland's dick before he died!

(I don't care anymore.. I owe Best absolutely fucking NOTHING after what he did about me on his shite-house of a fucking blog today ... and all because I fucking whupped his fucking arse on the science issue! Like talk about a pathetic fucking LOSER!).

Cube, I'll contact u immediately...

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 5:12 PM
Mr. Andrews, I emailed you

By Anonymous, at 6:02 PM
Cube,

thanks for the proof.

i'll need a bit of time to go through it...

but it does look an appealing docunent! i'm looking forward to having a lovely little distractor from life to keep my mind alive!

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:26 PM
Andrews,
Baggs was not autistic before she used LSD.
You did not beat me on any science issue. Mercury causes autism and chelation cures it. Those two statements are facts. You either learn them or keep making stupid remarks.

By John Best, at 10:29 PM
i beat your fucking arse on the science issues, so now stop lying ... to yourself and to others, you pig-ugly lying fuck.

no point talking to a cretin like you... you're too pig-headed anyway.

best thing you could do for anybody really... just to not exist. everybody'd be happy with that.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 3:25 AM
Foresam said: "Mercury causes autism and chelation cures it. Those two statements are facts."

Mercury does not cause Autism. Prove that it does, Fore Sam. Show the studies that prove that it does. Until you do it is not fact it is speculation.

By Anonymous, at 3:35 AM
Anon: "Mercury does not cause Autism. Prove that it does, Fore Sam. Show the studies that prove that it does. Until you do it is not fact it is speculation."

He'll never do that because he knows it's not possible to do it without risking looking like a thick twat when the result would be against what he says. And - after a recent court case - his idea isn't even a speculation now.

He hasn't got into this properly because it fucks his ignorant world-view. He's hopeless and not really worth challenging on anything because ... well, I've seen rocks learn quicker than he does.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:16 AM
Nitwits,
Read my blog and you will find all the proof you want. I'm not going to rewrite it all here for you.

By John Best, at 8:02 AM
Mr. Andrews, did you receive my second email?

By Anonymous, at 8:17 AM
John, your blog is not a science blog so just reading it is not proof of anything. Well except your irrational ass sucking behavior!

By Matt Hogan, at 3:35 PM
Matt,
The science I discuss is honest, not some crazed propaganda that claims to be science like we see all over the ND blogs.

By John Best, at 4:53 PM
Speculation is not honest science, Foresam.

By Anonymous, at 3:59 AM
The Lying Bastard said: "The science I discuss is honest, not some crazed propaganda that claims to be science like we see all over the ND blogs."

Your blog's got fuck all to do with science and it has never been honest.

About time you admitted to yourself that you are the only autism fraud going. Everybody else here knows that's what you are.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:30 AM
Anonymous: "Speculation is not honest science, Foresam."

It isn't even speculation. It's just bullshit. Even if that lying fucking prepuce-faced little shit can't accept that, it is nonetheless still true.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:06 AM
Cube,

Yes, yes I did... I'll get back to you on that in a bit...

:)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:35 AM
I will be waiting for your response, Mr. Andrews

By Anonymous, at 8:39 AM
Fat Bastard,
Can you reference any lies?

By John Best, at 8:48 AM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 11:00 AM
"Fat Bastard,
Can you reference any lies?"

Just about everything you ever fucking say.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 11:01 AM
Fat Bastard,
That's too general to be considered an acceptable answer. You made the charge so point out some specific lies, nitwit. I din't think you can find any.

By John Best, at 11:50 AM
"Fat Bastard,
That's too general to be considered an acceptable answer. You made the charge so point out some specific lies, nitwit. I din't think you can find any."

If I were to list them all, this blog would be full of them. As it is, you've managed to put shitloads on here that's lies.

(word verification here suit JBJr very well: mingr)

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 12:34 PM
David, just pick a few lies. I think Timelord did that somewhere as well.

By Matt Hogan, at 5:20 PM
Matt,

He's stupid enough to think that, if he just denies it's a lie or denies he even said it, that others will believe that; seen it all before... there's at least two threads on blogs with that sort of thing.

Not worth doing any more of it.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:32 PM
Fat Bastard,
You can't find any lies so that makes you a fucking liar.

By John Best, at 7:01 PM
"You can't find any lies so that makes you a fucking liar."

Fuck off, shitbreath,

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 7:28 PM
Fat Bastard,
Another evasive answer. That means you confirm that you're a fucking liar.

By John Best, at 8:03 PM
"Another evasive answer. That means you confirm that you're a fucking liar."

Looks like someone cannot distinguish between a comment and an instruction.

Because he has shit for brains.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 12:43 AM
Sanity Pending,
Insults are not answers.

By John Best, at 1:09 AM
Okay, Foresam, here are some of the lies from this thread alone.

# corrupt judges have ruled in favor of poisoning babies
# domestic enemies are now running the United States
# I'm there for my son.
# Have you cured your daughter's Asperger's as I did with my younger son?
(Lie bolded)
# Your kid is still fucked up from mercury poisoning
# I cure the conditions because I have the ability to reason
# I approach autism with a similar strategy, small gains that equal large gains over time.
# she's not as brain damaged by mercury as my kid was
# my other son who had the same diagnosis as your kid is cured now
# We have enemies in DC and they need to be ousted right now.
# Damn right I can put land mines there if I want to, and I don't need to put warning signs in Spanish either.
# We don't live in a democracy now.
# I have 3 kids.
# Intelligent people play the stock market
# Since the govt. works for us, and it is unconstitutional for them to restrict anyone's weapons, we are not bound by their rules.
# The people in power are not paying any attention to the Constitution.
# Fat Bastard, You're the asshole who spreads false information about autism.
# Vaccines are being used as weapons.
# Fighting is fun, as are all contact sports where people hit each orher
# Since your average citizen has no ulterior agenda that is paid for with bribes, we are a lot safer with weapons than the government is.
# I wouldn't shoot someone like you.
# I'm not a bully.
# everyone associated with Neuroinsanity is a child abuser.
# But, if someone messes with him, he is strong as a bull and will fight back. That will serve him well if he does have to be asylumized someday and some deranged attendants try to mess with him
# It's not possible to fuck someone up permanently who is already fucked up with autism.
# I'm 100% certain autism is mercury poisoning.
# The leaders of ND all know they are nothing but propaganda merchants.
# The truth is chelation cures it so, that's it, end of debate.

By Anonymous, at 1:15 AM
This comment has been removed by the author.

By David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E., at 6:54 AM

Whose Planet Is It Anyway?

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Poof! The Vaccine Lawsuit

214 Comments:

About

Contributors

Comments Closed

Previous